1099-DA Crypto Tax Form: Cost Basis Missing, DeFi Reporting Gaps Ahead of April 15

The IRS is now issuing the 1099-DA digital asset reporting form for 2025 activity, and it shows how much crypto each investor sold—but not the purchase price (cost basis). Tax liability hinges on sale price minus cost basis, yet 1099-DA currently provides only the sale side of the equation, creating mismatch risk during IRS automated matching and audits. Kent Miller Photography quotes Janna Scott, founder of DeFi Tax, who warns that many crypto tax tools cannot explain how numbers are calculated well enough to survive scrutiny. The article notes that cost basis reporting by brokers is scheduled later and may apply only to certain assets bought on/after Jan. 1, 2026 and still on-exchange; assets transferred out, moved between platforms, or held in self-custody may show no basis. Key coverage gap: the 1099-DA applies to centralized exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini) and does not cover decentralized protocols, self-custody wallets, liquidity pools, token bridges, or cross-chain swaps. A planned expansion for DeFi reporting in 2027 was reportedly repealed. For users trading across both CEX and DeFi, the 1099-DA captures only exits, while DeFi “entry” events are invisible to traditional reporting. DeFi Tax claims it avoids CSV imports and instead reads transaction data directly from the blockchain to produce traceable, audit-ready figures. With the April 15 filing deadline approaching, the article advises traders to reconcile transactions across every exchange and wallet now, because being unable to explain reported numbers may increase enforcement and audit risk. Main trading takeaway: near-term volatility can rise as compliance-driven selling or “tax-loss harvesting” attempts emerge, but the core impact is procedural rather than market-structure changing.
Neutral
该新闻的核心是 1099-DA 报表口径与成本基础缺失,以及 DeFi 活动在申报体系中的覆盖缺口。它更像是“合规/税务基础设施”的问题,而不是影响链上或需求侧的直接催化剂。 短期(未来数周)可能出现的影响更偏交易层面:一旦投资者在对账中发现成本基础缺失或交易分类需要修正,可能推动部分人进行集中卖出、税损收割或提前平仓,从而造成局部波动。但因为这类事件通常不会在全市场同步发生,影响更可能是波动率上升而非单边趋势。 长期(至 2026/2027)更关键的是:如果监管对数字资产申报的自动匹配与审计继续收紧,投资者与工具方会更重视“可解释、可追溯”的交易记录(这也是文章强调的区块链可审计性)。从历史经验看,类似“监管报送/信息披露口径升级”事件往往先带来流程性扰动,再推动市场参与者调整风控与簿记方式,最终回归相对稳定。 因此整体判断为 neutral:对交易者而言要管理的是申报风险与潜在的短期流动性波动,而非对宏观价格方向作出确定性押注。