Bitcoin may have priced tighter policy early as Fed-cut odds fall, Bitwise says

Bitwise research says Bitcoin has already absorbed the impact of tighter monetary policy, while equities look more vulnerable to fresh macro shocks. The catalyst is energy volatility: tensions around the Strait of Hormuz have lifted oil and natural gas, strengthening inflation expectations and pushing markets to trim Federal Reserve rate-cut bets. On rate-cut pricing, odds shifted away from near certainty. The probability of no rate reduction in 2026 has risen to about 40%. Bitcoin is down roughly 23.7% year-to-date and slipped below $70,000, but Bitwise argues this selloff reflects earlier risk repricing rather than a late reaction to the latest energy-driven data. Key signals traders may watch: the Mayer Multiple has remained in the lower end of its historical range since January, suggesting a valuation reset in crypto. Bitcoin’s dominance has also tightened market structure, with higher correlation across altcoins—consistent with a more single-factor, BTC-led environment. Trading takeaway: if macro shocks continue to pressure liquidity expectations, Bitcoin’s earlier valuation compression could help limit leverage-driven downside versus stocks in the short run.
Neutral
Bitwise frames the news as relative resilience for Bitcoin: the selloff appears to be an earlier repricing of tighter monetary conditions, supported by valuation (Mayer Multiple in low percentiles) and market structure (rising BTC dominance and higher altcoin correlation). That can cushion BTC versus equities if energy-driven inflation expectations keep shifting Fed odds. However, this is not a clear bullish catalyst for immediate upside. Bitcoin is still correcting (down ~23.7% YTD, below $70k), and rate-cut odds moving toward “no cuts” is a macro headwind for risk assets overall. Net impact on BTC price is therefore likely neutral: near-term volatility may persist, with downside possibly less severe than stocks, while upside depends on follow-through in macro data and whether BTC dominance remains a stabilizing factor.