Bernstein power-lease thesis lift TeraWulf, Cipher; target $36/$32

Bernstein start to dey cover TeraWulf (WULF) and Cipher Mining (CIFR) with Outperform ratings, using one "AI power lease" thesis: former Bitcoin miners fit act as "power landlords" by monetizing big, grid-connected electricity and data-center infrastructure under contract-backed HPC (high-performance computing) demand. The bank dey project say total AI-related revenue across their covered universe go rise from about $1.2B (2026) to $10.7B (2030). Dem forecast TeraWulf AI revenue at $1.7B and Cipher at $1.2B. For traders, the main thing na execution risk versus contract visibility, no be short-term Bitcoin price action. New gist from the later update: TeraWulf transition don show already. For Q1 2026, revenue na $34M, with 60% coming from HPC leases instead of Bitcoin mining, and the company don gather over $12B in long-term contracted HPC revenue. Bernstein also note say the stock reaction soft because both names don already rally for 2026 as AI optimism don partly price in. Context: Bernstein set price targets at $36 (WULF) and $32 (CIFR). E follow other Wall Street calls—Morgan Stanley (Overweight, ~$37–$38) and Jefferies (Buy, $32 for CIFR and $28 for WULF). For crypto traders, this one support continued "AI + power" capital rotation, but the long-term upside depend on hyperscaler compute demand staying on track.
Neutral
Di komot di ripot dem focus na di miners dem AI-related, kontrakt-backed HPC revenue, an dem tok say di “AI power lease” model na alternative demand driver we no depend pan immediate Bitcoin price. Even though dis fit boost sentiment pan di miner operators, e nor directly set a near-term catalyst for BTC spot demand or supply dynamics. Di mention say BTC don dey slide show say di trade link na more about positioning/rotation into “AI + power” equities dan about changing BTC fundamentals. Short term: market impact pan BTC look limited because di thesis clear say e nor dey rely on BTC price action. Long term: if hyperscaler compute growth continue maintain contracted demand, miner economics fit stabilise, but dat still na indirect effect on BTC price self. Overall, trader reaction likely go be sector-specific rather dan BTC-specific, so di expected impact on di cryptocurrency itselv neutral.