Bitget Boosts Bitcoin Reserve to 34,055 BTC After 114% Annual Rise
Leading crypto exchange Bitget increased its Bitcoin reserve to 34,055 BTC (just over $3 billion), a 114% year‑on‑year rise, according to on‑chain tracker Lookonchain. Reserve accumulation accelerated through 2025 — growing from about 28,022 BTC in August to 30,300 BTC by October and reaching 34,055 BTC in December — indicating larger inflows during periods of heightened trading activity and volatility. Bitget’s report also cited full reserve coverage for key assets (noted ratios for BTC, ETH, USDC and USDT), positioning the buildup as a move to strengthen its balance sheet and reassure users on custody transparency. For traders, the primary takeaways are: substantial spot accumulation on Bitget could deepen liquidity on its BTC markets and signal rising institutional or user demand; however, larger exchange reserves can also represent potential selling pressure that may cap price rallies. Bitcoin traded weaker in late 2025 (around $87,400 with intraday lows near $86,606), and market participants should monitor Bitget’s continued inflows and published reserve ratios for their potential impact on liquidity, order‑flow and short‑term volatility.
Neutral
Bitget’s large increase in BTC reserves is a meaningful market signal but has mixed price implications, so the net expected impact on BTC is neutral. Positive aspects: sustained accumulation suggests rising user or institutional demand, deeper liquidity on Bitget’s BTC order book and improved custody transparency — factors that can support price stability and longer‑term adoption. Negative aspects: higher exchange reserves increase the pool of BTC that could be sold into rallies, creating potential downward pressure or capping sharp upside in the short term. Short‑term impact: likely to increase local liquidity and order‑flow volatility around Bitget trading pairs; traders should watch for larger sell or buy walls and flow imbalances during high‑volatility sessions. Long‑term impact: continued accumulation combined with evidence of genuine off‑exchange custody or long‑term holding would be mildly bullish, but if inflows represent mainly short‑term depositor activity or exchange hedging, price impact could be neutral or slightly bearish. Given these offsetting forces and current BTC price weakness noted in the reports, classify the immediate price effect as neutral while monitoring ongoing flows and reserve disclosures for signs of a clearer directional influence.