Ethereum power for RWA tokenization dey face wahala from Solana and other blockchain wey dey follow rules well
Ethereum dey lead now for real-world assets (RWA) tokenization because of im strong system, wetin institutions trust am for, and plenty money for DeFi. Big big companies, like JPMorgan and European Investment Bank, don choose Ethereum for big RWA work, because of im old token rules like ERC-1400 and ERC-3643. But, Ethereum still get problem with how to make am big (scalability), money for transaction dey just change any how, and e dey take time to settle transactions compare to normal money system. While Layer 2 ways and protocol updates dey try to fix these problems, new projects dey come out and people dey look them. Solana, with im fast and cheap transactions, dey draw RWA projects wey need work wey fast and automatic. Special blockchains like MANTRA and Maple still dey come out, wey get their own rules wey dey follow law and features wey dem make for tokenization of assets wey dem control. Even though Ethereum get plenty money and government don accept am for big RWA structure, demand for ways wey fit make big and follow law dey push new projects go other platforms. As RWA market still small now—less than 2% of wetin dem expect—who go lead for the next time go probably depend on how well dem fit follow law for chain, get full service system, and get money wey no dey finish. The move to use many chains dey show say competition go plenty, and traders suppose watch where RWA money dey go and which platforms people like for possible chances.
Neutral
Even though Ethereum still dey lead for RWA tokenization because of its big DeFi money, institutional support, and standards wey don prove say dem good, new rivals like Solana and dem compliance-focused blockchains don dey bring serious competition. The wahala of scalability and fees for Ethereum don make some projects dey look for other chains, which fit gradually chop Ethereum RWA market share. But, the overall RWA market still small well well, and Ethereum current position, how regulators accept am, and the way dem dey actively develop Layer 2 solutions still make am attractive for short term. So, the immediate price effect no too strong. For long term, if competition increase, if dem adopt multi-chain, and if dem fit integrate compliance features well, e fit shift money and affect value – but this effect still dey unfold. Traders suppose monitor migration trends, but no big bullish or bearish catalyst dey expected for immediate term.