BIS Ex–Chief: Stablecoins Should Coexist With Fiat—With Global Regulation
Former Bank for International Settlements (BIS) general manager Agustín Carstens said stablecoins can support financial innovation, inclusion and lower costs, and argued they should be allowed to coexist with fiat money. Speaking at the Point Zero Forum, he said policymakers should “establish conditions where we can live with fiat money and stablecoins,” softening his earlier BIS-era warnings.
Carstens previously criticized stablecoins in 2022 over risks that issuers could invest reserves in ways that make them “risky,” and he later warned in 2025 about liquidity risk and the need for money to meet core trust tests. However, he now argues that stablecoins can flourish if regulators create a cooperative, global framework and a “level playing field” for issuers.
The BIS’s current leadership remains cautious. BIS general manager Pablo Hernández de Cos said the stablecoin market is still “small,” and its structural features limit its ability to function as money. A BIS preview ahead of its 2026 Annual Economic Report reiterated that today’s stablecoin designs may fail key properties needed for trust in money, and that broad adoption could pose financial-stability risks, affect bank funding, and challenge monetary sovereignty.
Still, the BIS also endorsed tokenization within the two-tier banking system, suggesting programmable finance could expand while preserving “trust in money.” Carstens pointed to existing jurisdictional rules: the US GENIUS Act (100% high-quality reserves, including cash and short-term Treasuries) and the EU’s MiCA framework (authorization, approved white paper, full reserve backing, and segregation of reserves).
Neutral
Carstens’ shift toward “stablecoins coexisting with fiat” is a constructive signal for the industry, but the BIS still highlights unresolved risks (trust, liquidity, financial stability, bank funding and monetary sovereignty). That mix typically produces a neutral trading setup: less negative headlines for stablecoin policy, but no immediate endorsement of large-scale adoption. Historically, similar “regulatory lightening” comments (when paired with continued supervisory warnings) tend to support short-term risk sentiment in token markets, yet the effect fades unless concrete rule changes follow.
Short term, traders may see reduced tail-risk around stablecoin regulations and interpret tokenization support as incremental bullish sentiment. Long term, the key driver is whether global, cooperative regulation actually lowers issuance and reserve compliance uncertainty; otherwise, BIS caution can keep volatility elevated around stablecoin/DeFi-related narratives.