CLARITY Act deadline looms as Senate gridlock stalls US crypto regulation

The crypto industry is racing to pass the CLARITY Act before a two-week window closes, but Senate gridlock and banking-industry pressure threaten to keep the bill stalled until 2030. The bill advanced in the House (July 2025) and is now stuck in the Senate, where Senate Banking has not scheduled a markup vote. Key driver: a fight over stablecoin “yield” rights. Traditional banks warn that allowing interest on yield-bearing stablecoins could trigger deposit flight and squeeze bank lending. The American Bankers Association (ABA) argues community banks would be forced into costlier funding, raising credit costs for small businesses. Counterpoint from the White House: a multi-agency effort centered on a Council of Economic Advisers report claims the macroeconomic risks are overstated. It estimates that banning stablecoin interest would shift US bank lending by only ~$2.1B (about 0.02%), while allowing yields could avoid an estimated ~$800M in annual welfare loss. Notable figures and political timing: Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong reversed course after a US Treasury push, publicly urging lawmakers to pass the CLARITY Act. Still, Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott has not scheduled a markup date. If the committee does not act soon, procedural timelines imply the bill must clear Banking by mid-May to reach a floor vote before Memorial Day; missing summer could push decisive action into a less crypto-friendly post-election environment. Market watch: Polymarket and Kalshi show odds falling materially for CLARITY Act passage this year, reflecting growing regulatory uncertainty for US crypto markets.
Neutral
CLARITY Act 的核心仍是“稳定币收益(yield)如何监管”的拉锯,而当前最大变量是参议院金融委员会尚未排期 markup、且时间窗口非常紧。对交易者而言,这类“立法不确定性”往往带来短期波动:当市场认为通过概率下降时,风险偏好会收缩,US 政策溢价(政策风险溢出到风险资产定价)会抬升;但如果同时出现关键利益相关方(如 Coinbase CEO)公开转向支持,且程序推进被市场重新定价,也会带来阶段性反弹。 与过去类似的情形相比:当美国监管法案从委员会拖向选举季,通常会让交易者更倾向于在“事件前低仓位/对冲”,并把波动集中在消息驱动窗口,而非形成单边趋势。短期上,CLARITY Act 通过概率下调(赔率下滑)可能继续压制与监管叙事相关的情绪;长期上,若法案最终在下一阶段被推动,明确的 SEC/CFTC 归属与稳定币规则框架可能降低合规成本并改善市场预期,但兑现需要时间,难以立刻转为持续利多。