CLARITY Act Draft Restricts Stablecoin Rewards, Banking-Like Yield Curbed

Crypto lobbyists and US regulators discussed a new legislative draft on Capitol Hill after months of talks between crypto and bank representatives. The latest “CLARITY Act” proposal would stop crypto platforms from offering stablecoin rewards that function like interest-bearing deposits. Under the draft, stablecoin rewards are banned “directly or indirectly” or in any form that resembles a bank deposit. Sources cited by journalist Eleanor Terrett say the restriction would apply broadly across digital asset service providers and affiliates, aiming to close loopholes and prevent any “economically or functionally” equivalent interest model. The draft keeps incentives alive, but only if they are activity-based rather than interest-based. Platforms could still use loyalty, promotion, or subscription-style programmes—so long as regulators judge them not to be “interest.” The SEC, CFTC, and the US Treasury are expected to jointly define what types of rewards qualify as permissible and how the rules will be enforced. Industry reactions are mixed. Some participants argue the standard (including “economic equivalence”) is vague and may give regulators room for strict interpretation, potentially limiting how rewards can be tied to balances or transaction volumes. Others say the proposal is close to expectations and could still allow transaction-based rewards while preventing stablecoins from operating like yield accounts. Bank representatives are set to review the text this week, following earlier versions such as the Tillis-Alsobrooks proposal, which reportedly would have been more restrictive. Overall, the CLARITY Act draft signals tighter oversight of stablecoin “interest-like” products, while preserving non-interest engagement incentives.
Neutral
CLARITY Act 的核心影响在于打击“stablecoin rewards里带有利息/存款等价物”的产品形态,但允许以“用户参与度/活动”为基础的合规激励。这通常会让短期市场对稳定币收益率相关的商业模式产生不确定性,从而压制部分需求与相关代币生态的叙事;但由于政策也保留交易型与活动型激励空间,行业可预期的合规路径有助于降低极端监管尾部风险。类似于过去围绕交易所“合规激励、收益代币化与利息性质界定”的执法或立法讨论(监管先收紧、随后给出更清晰边界),短期可能偏波动,但长期更可能推动市场从“收益型稳定币借贷/类存款回报”向“可审计的活动积分与促销”迁移。对交易者而言,短线关注稳定币收益策略是否下架、以及平台如何重构奖励条款;中长期则看监管口径(经济等价性、利息定义)是否落地得更明确,从而影响市场风险溢价与行业估值。