Crypto Firms, Banks Reach Compromise on Stablecoin Rewards in CLARITY Act Talks

U.S. crypto firms have proposed a compromise in negotiations over the CLARITY Act that would permit regional and community banks to issue stablecoins and require stablecoin issuers to deposit a large share of reserves with qualifying banks. The framework aims to decentralize issuance, channel stablecoin reserves into federally regulated banks, and allow limited consumer rewards while imposing guardrails (caps on yields, reserve composition rules favoring U.S. Treasuries and cash, and disclosure requirements). Major issuers such as Circle (USDC) and Tether (USDT) are named as affected parties. Banking groups, including the American Bankers Association, remain concerned about deposit outflows and “disintermediation” that could raise borrowing costs and strain regional banks. Negotiations involve the White House, Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, and other Congressional stakeholders as lawmakers seek a bipartisan market-structure deal before the election cycle narrows the legislative window. The compromise could set U.S. regulatory precedent for stablecoins globally and is contingent on details: the percentage of reserves required in banks, bank eligibility, and caps on permissible rewards. If finalized, the plan could bring stablecoin reserves onto regulated bank balance sheets, reducing run risk but also creating integration points between crypto and traditional banking. Key keywords: stablecoin rewards, CLARITY Act, reserve mandate, bank-issued stablecoins, USDC, USDT.
Neutral
The compromise reduces regulatory uncertainty by offering a clear framework that integrates stablecoins with the banking system, which is positive for market structure and institutional adoption — a bullish structural signal. However, the detailed rules (reserve percentages, reward caps, bank eligibility) are unresolved and could materially constrain yield-bearing stablecoin products. Banking opposition and potential strict guardrails create downside risk for rapid adoption or attractive yields, limiting immediate crypto demand. Short-term market reaction may be muted or volatile as traders price in legislative risk and detail uncertainty. Longer-term, a balanced federal framework that channels reserves into banks could increase institutional confidence, liquidity, and stablecoin legitimacy — supportive for crypto markets tied to dollar stablecoins — but only if rules are not overly restrictive. Historical parallels: proposals that clarified custody and compliance (e.g., post-2022 stablecoin scrutiny) reduced uncertainty and supported recovery; conversely, strict limits or bans on yield programs in other jurisdictions have capped demand for stablecoins and related DeFi yields. Overall, expect neutral-to-mildly bullish structural impact in the medium term, with volatile short-term trading around legislative milestones and specific rule releases.