Coin Center Argues Crypto Code Is Protected First Amendment Speech
Coin Center says crypto developers should not face criminal liability for “publishing” functional software code, arguing it is protected as First Amendment speech. In a Monday report, Peter Van Valkenburgh and Lizandro Pieper compare writing and releasing crypto code to publishing a book or recipe. They warn that requiring licensing, “pre-registration,” or other permissioning for software publication would amount to prior restraint and violate First Amendment principles.
The report also draws a line for regulators: writing and maintaining code is protected speech, but developers can cross into regulatable conduct if they directly control user assets, execute transactions for users, or make decisions on users’ behalf. Coin Center cites Supreme Court precedent such as Lowe v. SEC and argues lower courts have confused software “speech” with “conduct” because code can produce real-world effects.
The argument comes amid recent high-profile convictions, including Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm on unlicensed money-transmitting charges, with co-founders of Samourai Wallet also convicted and sentenced to prison terms. Coin Center’s framing aims to give courts and regulators a clearer framework so developers are not treated as scapegoats for how others use software.
For traders, the key takeaway is regulatory risk could shift from “software publication” toward “operator-like control,” potentially reducing uncertainty around open-source and developer publishing—though specific cases will still depend on facts and jurisdiction.
Neutral
Coin Center 的新报告并不改变任何具体币价或协议参数,但它可能影响“开发者是否会因代码发布而被追责”的监管预期。因为文本强调:代码写作与发布受 First Amendment 保护,监管重点应放在开发者是否直接控制用户资产、执行交易或替用户决策。若法院/监管在未来案件中采纳这一框架,短期可能降低市场对“开源开发者遭刑责”的尾部风险溢价,长期则可能提高合规确定性。
不过,文章基于法律论证,并非判决或立法结果;且文中提到的 Tornado Cash 与 Samourai Wallet 案件表明,现实执行仍高度依赖个案事实(尤其是“控制/参与”程度)。因此更可能带来的是预期管理而非立刻的市场再定价。类似地,当监管机构与法院对“技术行为与合规边界”的定义更清晰时,市场通常会先形成情绪性缓和,再等待后续裁决验证,价格影响往往从“情绪面”转向“执行面”需要时间。