Bittensor rift: Covenant AI exits, TAO drops 15% on emissions/governance claims
Covenant AI, the team behind the Covenant-72B model, says it has exited Bittensor, calling the network “decentralization theatre.” The announcement followed renewed accusations that Bittensor founder Jacob Steeves (“Const”) effectively controls key governance in a “triumvirate” setup and resists power transfer.
Covenant AI claims Steeves suspended emissions for its subnets, cutting income, and used large TAO token sales as “economic pressure.” Steeves denies these points, saying he cannot directly suspend emissions and that any emission changes are normal on-chain buy/sell activity; he also said moderation restrictions were temporary.
Price reaction was immediate. After the exit, TAO fell more than 15% (over 24 hours). Sell volume reportedly spiked to the highest level since Dec 2024 ahead of the announcement, with some analysts viewing it as planned execution.
Newer reporting adds another layer: a site called “Tao Papers” published internal documents and on-chain forensics alleging that from 2023–2026, Steeves-controlled infrastructure proposed, first-signed, and deployed 38 of 41 Bittensor upgrades, with other signers co-signing within minutes and without public discussion. Steeves pointed to a future plan for “headless” subnets but did not directly address emissions/governance-control claims.
For TAO traders, this is a governance-and-alignment shock. Expect elevated volatility as narrative risk and token sell-pressure concerns compete with any rebuilding/roadmap expectations.
Bearish
TAO 的即时下跌(15%+)以及卖出量在公告前大幅放大,表明“治理可信度/发行受阻/潜在单方控制”叙事已经触发了短期风险定价。无论 Steeves 的否认是否完全站得住脚,Covenant AI 退出本身会加剧投资者对 AI 代币治理与现金流安全性的担忧。
短期看,围绕 emissions、subnet 权限与大额 TAO 卖压的争议会维持交易活跃度和波动;若后续出现更多项目离开或链上调查延伸,可能继续压制情绪。
长期看,若“headless”子网等方案能实质性改善治理透明度并降低可疑的控制集中度,市场可能逐步修复。但在证据争议与叙事风险尚未明朗前,整体更偏向风险回避,因此对 TAO 的价格冲击偏 bearish。