Drift Protocol Hack Drains $286M in 12 Minutes on Solana
On April 1, 2026, the Drift Protocol hack hit the Solana DeFi sector hard: attackers drained about $286 million from Drift in roughly 12 minutes. Drift is the largest decentralized perpetual futures exchange on Solana.
Drift reported TVL falling from ~$550M to under ~$250M, with TVL later around $232M. The DRIFT token reportedly dropped as much as 37%–42%, bottoming near $0.04–$0.05.
Investigators say the Drift Protocol hack started not as a code exploit, but via Tornado Cash: ETH was withdrawn from Tornado Cash (Mar 11) and used to deploy a token (carbonvote/CVT) on Mar 12. Over the next weeks, attackers seeded minimal liquidity on Raydium and used wash trading to keep CVT near ~$1, tricking Drift’s oracles into treating the fake collateral as valid.
A key factor was governance: Drift’s team described a “durable nonce” attack that enabled attackers to pre-sign administrative actions through the Security Council multisig. The timelock was removed on Mar 27 (typically a 24–72 hour delay). With the delay gone, pre-signed transactions executed immediately on Apr 1—then attackers listed CVT as collateral, raised withdrawal limits, and deposited large CVT amounts to trigger real asset issuance.
Stolen proceeds were reportedly converted and routed quickly via Jupiter, bridges to Ethereum, and further swaps (including through Hyperliquid and Binance). Security firms Elliptic and TRM Labs attribute the operation to DPRK-linked Lazarus Group activity.
Contagion risks followed: multiple DeFi protocols paused or disabled key functions (e.g., Carrot and Pyra), and some users faced access issues. As of Apr 3, no full reimbursement plan was publicly confirmed.
Bearish
这次 Drift Protocol hack 属于“治理/权限失效 + 预签名绕过延迟”的高冲击型 DeFi 事故。短期看,Drift 的 TVL 快速塌陷与 DRIFT 代币急跌通常会压制市场风险偏好,并提高永续合约/抵押借贷赛道的安全溢价定价(资金更倾向于流向更保守的协议)。同时,多家协议被动暂停提款会放大“同类风险”的联想,导致交易者更倾向于降仓、观望或转向更高流动性/更强风控的资产。
中期看,市场往往会把重点放在“timelock 是否可被移除、权限如何分层、预签名机制如何审计”上。若监管/行业推动安全基线,短期情绪可能先跌后稳,但资金会从治理透明度较低或延迟机制缺失的协议流出,形成结构性分化。
历史上,类似桥/协议被盗事件(例如 Ronin 等)通常在最初几天形成恐慌与波动扩散,随后进入“追踪-回滚/赔付-重建”的阶段。若 Drift 迟迟未公布可信的恢复与补偿路径,情绪和流动性压力可能持续更久;反之,若能快速明确损失边界与补偿方案,市场下行可能在风险评估后逐步缓和。