FTC proposes settlement with Nomad operator after $186M bridge hack

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a consent settlement with Illusory Systems Inc., operator of the Nomad cross‑chain bridge, following a June–August 2022 smart‑contract vulnerability that led to about $186 million in stolen digital assets and over $100 million in consumer losses. The FTC alleges Nomad marketed itself as security‑first but failed to follow secure‑coding, testing and incident‑response practices; a faulty code update in June 2022 introduced a defect exploited from August 1, 2022. Nomad recovered roughly $22 million after the exploit. Under the proposed settlement Illusory Systems must implement a formal information security program, submit to independent security assessments every two years, cease making deceptive security claims, and return any recovered funds to affected users. The FTC has published the signed consent agreement for 30 days of public comment and may pursue enforcement under the Federal Trade Commission Act if the settlement is approved. For traders: the case highlights ongoing risks with cross‑chain bridges, the importance of smart‑contract audits and clear incident‑response processes, and increased regulatory scrutiny of security claims — factors that can raise perceived counterparty and smart‑contract risk and amplify volatility around affected bridge‑linked tokens and liquidity.
Bearish
This news is likely bearish for assets directly linked to Nomad and for confidence in cross‑chain bridge services. The FTC settlement underscores regulatory risk and confirms significant past losses ($186M stolen, ~$100M consumer impact), which can erode trust among users and liquidity providers. Requirements for formal security programs and biennial audits increase operational costs and signal that bridges will face ongoing scrutiny; markets may price in higher counterparty and smart‑contract risk premiums. In the short term, expect heightened volatility and potential outflows from bridge‑dependent tokens or liquidity pools as traders rebalance positions to reduce exposure. In the medium to long term, improved security controls and clearer remediation obligations could restore some confidence, but the reputational damage and precedent of regulatory enforcement make sustained discounting of bridge‑related risk likely until consistent, audited security practices become widespread.