Gemini prediction markets: $589M 2025 loss, trading volumes fall, regulatory fight intensifies

Gemini (NASDAQ: GEMI) posted FY2025 results showing a major financial hit while pivoting toward prediction markets. The company reported 2025 net losses of about $589M (vs. $151M in 2024), alongside Q4 net loss of $140.8M (more than 5x Q4 2024). Revenue for Q4 was $60.3M (record, up ~40% YoY), but overall trading revenue fell over one-fifth in Q4 to $24.5M, with trading volume down for both retail (-38.4%) and institutional (-22%). Gemini’s only clear growth driver was its crypto-linked credit card segment: card signups rose from 38,000 (end-2024) to 145,000 (end-2025), lifting Q4 card revenue to just under $16M and FY card revenue to $33.1M (+185%). The shift to Gemini prediction markets has also drawn investor scrutiny, including a class-action lawsuit over the “viability” of Gemini’s core crypto platform ahead of its Nasdaq listing. Regulatory context is mixed for Gemini prediction markets. CFTC Chair Michael Selig recently praised prediction markets as “decentralized truth,” supporting federal oversight. However, US states continue to challenge operators in court, with cases against Kalshi and Polymarket, including allegations of unlicensed “event contracts.” Arizona filed criminal charges against Kalshi’s parent companies related to election wagering. At the same time, MLB named Polymarket its “official prediction market exchange,” citing integrity commitments, while US lawmakers introduced stricter proposals targeting “death” and violence-related event trading. For traders, the message is clear: Gemini prediction markets may gain regulatory attention, but legal and state-level enforcement risk remains a headwind.
Bearish
Gemini 2025年约5.89亿美元亏损、Q4净亏损显著扩大,再叠加交易量在零售与机构端同步下滑,说明“从加密到市场业务”的商业转型尚未跑通。更重要的是,Gemini prediction markets的增长预期受制于美国联邦与州之间的管辖冲突:CFTC的相对支持提升了行业叙事,但州级诉讼与刑事指控(如亚利桑那对Kalshi的指控、内华达/俄亥俄/密歇根等案件)会制造合规不确定性,从而压制投资者风险偏好。 短期看,监管/诉讼新闻往往会带来情绪与流动性扰动,交易者可能更倾向于降低“高叙事、高不确定”的仓位;长期看,如果像MLB与CFTC“诚信承诺/信息共享”这类框架继续落地,预测市场可能获得更清晰的合规路径,但在出现类似历史上“监管落地但执行多头化”时期那样的反复之前,市场仍可能保持谨慎。