US regulators push stablecoin rulemaking as GENIUS Act takes effect

US federal agencies are accelerating stablecoin oversight as the GENIUS Act begins implementation. The FDIC will publish an application framework for bank-linked payment stablecoin issuers later this month and plans a second proposal on prudential requirements early next year. The FDIC will supervise and license subsidiaries of insured depository institutions that issue payment stablecoins and will set capital, liquidity and reserve diversification standards. The Federal Reserve is coordinating capital, liquidity and diversification standards with other banking regulators, and Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman will detail the Fed’s work at a House hearing. The Treasury Department has completed public consultations and is drafting its rules. The FDIC is also developing guidance on tokenised deposits. Agencies will solicit public comment before finalising rules, and multiple rulemakings will roll out over the coming year to meet GENIUS Act obligations. Key implications for crypto markets: clearer regulatory expectations for bank-issued stablecoins, tighter prudential standards for issuers, and coordinated federal oversight that may affect product launches, bank participation in crypto, and stablecoin liquidity profiles.
Neutral
The news increases regulatory clarity for bank-linked stablecoins, which is generally positive for long-term market structure but introduces near-term compliance costs and operational constraints for issuers. Clear licensing, capital, liquidity and reserve rules reduce legal uncertainty that has previously hampered banking participation — a constructive factor for institutional adoption and market stability over time. However, stricter prudential requirements and supervisory oversight can raise issuance costs, limit leverage, and reduce short-term liquidity of some stablecoins, which may pressure trading desks and arbitrage flows. Historically, greater regulatory clarity (for example, clearer custody and bank custody frameworks) has supported institutional entry but temporarily reduced product availability and liquidity as firms adjust. Therefore the likely market reaction is mixed: neutral overall, with potential short-term volatility for specific stablecoins or issuer-linked tokens but improved stability and participation prospects longer term.