Hedge funds resume shorting after biggest squeeze since 2020, shifting to market-neutral bets
Hedge funds are resuming shorting just weeks after suffering the biggest short squeeze since the March 2020 rebound. In March 2026, Goldman Sachs prime brokerage data showed short sales outpaced long buys by a 7.6-to-1 ratio globally—the fastest net selling pace in 13 years. About 76% of those shorts were concentrated in major stock indexes and ETFs, turning the trade into a broad “bet against the market,” which made the unwind swift and painful.
The squeeze followed a major risk-relief catalyst: on April 8, President Trump announced a temporary ceasefire in the US-Iran conflict, and equities rallied sharply. Hedge funds scrambled to cover, with the short-covering pace the fastest since March 2020. Macro short exposure reportedly peaked at 12% of total gross exposure before the unwind, the highest since the pandemic.
By late April and early May, hedge funds recalibrated their approach. Rather than adding more broad index shorts (as in March), hedge funds appear to be rebuilding bearish exposure more surgically: market-neutral positioning first, plus selective single-stock shorts and relative-value trades. Multi-strategy funds—including Citadel, Schonfeld, and ExodusPoint—reportedly navigated the turbulence better through faster repositioning.
For traders, the key takeaway is that hedge funds are hedge-driven shorting again—but with tighter risk controls and less crowding into index-level bets, which could mean choppier but more managed volatility ahead.
Bearish
This is not crypto-native news, but it can affect risk sentiment. Hedge funds resume shorting after a violent squeeze, which typically signals two things for the broader market: (1) previous overcrowding is unwound, and (2) new short exposure is being rebuilt with tighter controls. The article notes a shift away from broad index shorts toward market-neutral and selective trades. That can reduce “systemic” liquidation risk, but it still implies continued downside hedging pressure in equities.
Historically, similar feedback loops have mattered for crypto as well. The March 2020 comparison matters: after major squeezes and forced repositioning, markets can swing quickly as hedges are re-priced. For crypto traders, a renewed cycle of hedge-fund positioning can translate into (a) short-term volatility spikes across correlated risk assets when equities reverse, and (b) a longer-term tendency for investors to demand higher risk premia if bearish hedges remain persistent.
Because the article emphasizes more surgical/market-neutral shorting, the bearish effect may be moderate rather than one-way. Expect choppy sessions, higher sensitivity to equity macro headlines, and potential rotation in liquidity between equities and liquid crypto—especially if another geopolitical catalyst flips risk quickly.