Fed's Kashkari tok say crypto 'completely useless', dismiss stablecoins as 'buzzword salad'

Neel Kashkari, wey be president for Minneapolis Federal Reserve, sharply criticise cryptocurrencies and stablecoins for Midwest Economic Outlook Summit 2026 for Fargo. E talk say bitcoin and other crypto assets don dey over ten years but dem never show “any practical use,” and im argue say artificial intelligence get clear everyday use while crypto never deliver meaningful benefit. Kashkari reject talk say stablecoins dey improve payments, call industry language na “buzzword salad” and say dollar‑backed stablecoins no get much advantage reach tools like Venmo. E question stablecoin usefulness for remittances, point out conversion fees and local currency frictions wey reduce their practical value — e give example of one family for Philippines where money reach quick but dem still need expensive conversion to local fiat. Kashkari accept say some adoption dey for emerging markets but stress frictions and extra costs wey limit usefulness. Im remarks show clear difference between Fed’s skeptical stance and some US administration members wey publicly back regulated stablecoins and proposals like strategic bitcoin reserve. For traders: the comments signal continuing regulatory skepticism from Federal Reserve leaders, fit increase political and regulatory scrutiny of stablecoins and broader crypto policy debates — things wey fit make volatility bigger around major crypto assets and especially USDC/other dollar‑backed stablecoins.
Bearish
Kashkari wey na Federal Reserve president talk strong and for open way don make people see say regulatory and political risk don climb for crypto, especially dollar‑backed stablecoins and bitcoin. For traders, those kind comments from Fed leaders fit make short‑term volatility as markets start to price in possible tighter regulation, more oversight on stablecoins, or policy wahala between the Fed and pro‑crypto government people. Stablecoins fit see outflows or repricing risk if regulators start to put operational limits or stricter rules; BTC fit face downside pressure from higher policy uncertainty and less institutional appetite in the near term. For long term, the fundamentals of main networks still dey, but if regulatory hostility continue, e go likely slow down inflows and adoption. Overall, immediate impact likely negative (bearish) for price action because regulatory risk don increase and short‑term volatility go rise.