Crypto X parody account “peepeepoopoo” triggers pump.fun meme-coin scams
An anonymous Crypto X commentator, “peepeepoopoo” (@DeepDishEnjoyer), went viral on March 24 after claiming strangers are minting meme coins using his persona and then scamming each other. The post drew 50,500 views and sparked replies mocking the process as “making fucking shitcoins out of me.”
The account is a pseudonymous macro skeptic with a Substack and about 40,100 followers. It previously created a joke token, $THATSIT, warning it was “worth $0.” Despite the disclaimer, Chinese traders pumped it—believing it was linked to AI—before it collapsed after reaching a reported $2.6M market cap.
The new controversy shows how pump.fun’s low-friction setup can be exploited. The platform allows anyone to create Solana tokens for under $2, with no identity verification and no effective way to block deploying a token under someone else’s persona or name.
Multiple “peepeepoopoo”-branded tokens have appeared on pump.fun (and PumpSwap). One PP variant reportedly reached a $7,400 market cap within 24 hours with a 149.76% gain. The article also references prior persona-token cycles on pump.fun, including a brief spike to a ~$20M market cap for a JENNER token before a developer dumped.
Key takeaway for traders: persona-based meme coins on Solana DEX launchpads can move fast on hype, but the setup’s weak consent controls raise scam/rug risk.
Neutral
这条消息对市场的直接“基本面”影响有限，但会强化短线交易的情绪与风险定价。人设模仿梗币通常遵循“高热度—快速拉盘—流动性/持仓方退出（rug/套现）”的路径。文章里提到的 $THATSIT（最高约 260 万美元市值后崩盘）以及过往的 JENNER（曾短暂到约 2,000 万美元市值后开发者抛售）都与这种模式高度相似。
短期来看：
- pump.fun 上的“人设币”容易吸引投机资金，带来局部价格波动与成交放大，但波动往往伴随更快的回撤。
- 诈骗/冒用引发的争议可能在社群中形成“追涨—踩踏”两段式交易，放大下跌时的连锁反应。
长期来看：
- 若平台长期缺乏身份验证与部署限制，类似事件会不断出现，市场会逐步把这类代币的风险折价到更短期限、更高要求的风险溢价。
- 不过，这并不会显著改变 BTC/ETH 等主流资产的宏观定价框架，因此整体更偏“情绪与微观结构层面”的影响。
综合判断：对整体市场稳定性属于有限冲击，更可能影响的是 Solana 生态内的高风险新币交易行为，因此定为 neutral。