Bitcoiners Back Leaving Satoshi’s Coins Untouched Amid Quantum Risk
Bitcoiners are increasingly aligned that Satoshi Nakamoto’s original Bitcoin holdings should remain completely untouched. Galaxy Digital’s Alex Thorn said a community consensus is forming around “Satoshi’s coins (P2PK)” and that violating Satoshi’s property rights could harm Bitcoin’s core value proposition.
The debate is framed by “honeypot” fears tied to quantum computing potentially breaking Bitcoin’s early Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) cryptography. Thorn argued the threat is likely overstated because the coins are distributed across ~22,000 addresses, each holding 50 BTC, meaning a successful long-range attack would need to crack them all.
Thorn also noted that active entities and exchanges with larger consolidated wallets could proactively upgrade to post-quantum (PQ) addresses if needed. Even in an extreme scenario where Satoshi’s coins were compromised, the network is expected to absorb liquidity shocks, pointing to Bitcoin markets handling sell-offs exceeding 1 million BTC in the past. He suggested many Bitcoiners would accept even a 50% drawdown to preserve Satoshi’s property rights.
While the community favors keeping Satoshi’s coins untouched, it is still supporting behind-the-scenes work for post-quantum or other new Bitcoin-related developments.
Neutral
该消息核心并非直接的价格催化剂,而是关于“Bitcoiners 是否应动用中本聪币”的叙事与安全/技术路线讨论。Alex Thorn 强调 Satoshi’s coins 应保持不被触碰,并用“地址分散(~22,000 个地址、每个 50 BTC)导致量子蜂蜜罐攻击难度极高”来缓解市场对量子破密的担忧。与此同时,他也强调交易所/活跃实体可进行后量子(PQ)地址升级,且社区支持幕后开发。
因此对交易的直接影响更偏中性:短期内可能轻微抑制“量子导致大规模失窃/链上被动抛压”的恐慌情绪,降低极端尾部事件的定价溢价;但由于量子风险仍属长期不确定性,且“中本聪币不动用”的共识更多是治理/叙事层面,难以形成持续的基本面上行动能。
从历史类比看,类似的安全性争论(如隐私/签名方案迁移、硬分叉与脚本改造的预期)通常会在短期带来波动,但若缺乏明确时间表与可验证的行动,会更多表现为情绪修复而非趋势反转。长期则取决于后量子升级路径是否被进一步验证与落地,以及市场是否继续将此类“极端攻击”假设纳入风险管理。