South Korea Reauthorizes Corporate ICOs Under Disclosure and Liability Rules

South Korea will reauthorize corporate Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) under a disclosure-based framework after nearly nine years of prohibition. Announced as part of the second phase of the Digital Asset Basic Act, the rules limit token issuances to eligible corporations that meet capital and operational history thresholds and require comprehensive disclosure statements similar to securities registration filings. Mandatory disclosures will include whitepapers, technical details, team backgrounds, risk factors and ongoing reporting. Crucially, the framework imposes explicit corporate liability for post-issuance problems, shifting legal accountability onto issuing companies rather than treating filings as approvals. Authorities expect final legislation and administrative rules by mid-to-late 2025. The move aims to balance innovation and investor protection, attract institutional participation, create compliance service demand, and position South Korea as a regional hub for compliant token offerings. Market outcomes may include increased institutional interest, growth in crypto legal/compliance sectors, and potential influence on neighboring regulators.
Bullish
Reauthorizing corporate ICOs with a clear disclosure and liability framework reduces regulatory uncertainty and opens a new compliant fundraising channel for corporate token issuers. For traders, the announcement is likely bullish because regulatory clarity typically increases institutional participation and market liquidity, and may prompt token listings and new project launches tied to South Korean firms. The explicit corporate liability and disclosure requirements lower fraud risk compared with unregulated ICO booms, which can improve investor confidence and attract capital. In the short term, expect positive market sentiment around Korean blockchain, gaming and digital content tokens and modest price appreciation in related assets as speculative interest returns. Volume and volatility may spike around legislative milestones and initial filings. Over the medium to long term, clearer rules can drive sustained institutional flows, development of compliance services, and higher-quality token supply — all supportive of market growth. However, effects may be sector-specific and tempered by global macro conditions and how strictly eligibility and reporting rules are applied in implementation.