South Korea advances Phase‑2 virtual asset bill — won stablecoin rules, capital requirements and exchange ownership caps

South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party is fast‑tracking a Virtual Asset Phase‑2 bill to set comprehensive rules for won‑pegged stablecoins and limits on major shareholders of crypto exchanges ahead of the Lunar New Year. Key proposals include a statutory minimum capital of 5 billion won (~$3.46M) for stablecoin issuers, shareholder caps for exchange owners (proposed 15%–20%), and a new inter‑ministerial Virtual Asset Committee chaired by the Financial Services Commission. The Bank of Korea (BoK) is pushing for stricter controls: it wants banks to hold majority ownership (50%+1) of KRW stablecoin issuance and is exploring a domestic issuer registration system to protect monetary policy and capital controls. The Financial Services Commission and industry groups favour allowing private tech firms to issue stablecoins to speed market entry; the People Power Party opposes tight shareholder limits citing risks of capital flight and governance disruption. Remaining debates include central bank authority, limits on major shareholders, and whether issuance should be restricted to bank‑led consortia. The bill aims to align stablecoin treatment with electronic‑money standards and adds mechanisms to coordinate responses to hacks, system failures and large market disruptions. Traders should note several likely market effects: possible reduction in the number of private stablecoin issuers, slower rollout of new KRW stablecoins if banks are mandated, increased regulatory compliance costs and stronger balance sheets among issuers, and potential shifts in institutional participation depending on final rules. The timeline is short — sponsors aim to submit the bill for deliberation before Feb 17, 2026 — so outcomes could swiftly affect issuance, liquidity and on‑shore institutional activity in KRW stablecoins.
Neutral
The legislation creates mixed market signals that are neither clearly bullish nor bearish for KRW‑pegged stablecoins. Positive elements: a 5 billion won capital requirement and clearer rules should strengthen issuer solvency, increase investor confidence, and reduce systemic risk — factors that can support long‑term market stability and institutional participation. Negative elements: BoK proposals to force banks to majority‑own issuance, strict shareholder caps and heavier compliance could reduce the number of private issuers, slow new KRW stablecoin rollouts, and compress liquidity in the near term. Short term: likely increased volatility as market participants price regulatory uncertainty and potential supply constraints for KRW stablecoins; some projects may delay launches or seek offshore options. Long term: clearer regulation and stronger capitalization could be constructive for institutional adoption and risk management, but only if rules balance entry and oversight. Overall, the net price impact on KRW‑pegged stablecoins is neutral because the bill both mitigates risk (supportive) and raises barriers that could limit issuance and liquidity (dampening), with the final effect depending on unresolved provisions (bank ownership, shareholder caps, and timeline). Traders should monitor final legislative text and timeline, BoK vs FSC positions, and any interim guidance on issuer registration or operational standards.