Strategy expands Bitcoin buying plan to $60B+ ATM, boosts STRC
Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) expanded its Bitcoin buying plan via an SEC 8-K filed March 23, 2026. The company increased at-the-market (ATM) stock issuance capacity to over $60B, with total active capacity around $64.15B. This widens near-term funding flexibility for its BTC treasury strategy.
Under the new framework, Strategy can issue and sell up to $21B of Class A common stock (MSTR), up to $21B of Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC), and up to $2.1B of another preferred (STRK). Strategy terminated an older STRK program and will continue using existing prospectuses for common stock (~$15.85B) and STRC (~$4.2B) until sold.
The market-relevant shift is a clear tilt toward STRC. Authorized STRC shares were raised from 70,435,353 to 282,556,565, while authorized STRK shares were cut from 269,800,000 to 40,270,744. STRC is described as highly liquid (about ~$295.9M average daily volume). Strategy also holds 762,099 BTC, with an average cost near ~$75,700 per BTC (unrealized loss exceeding $3B).
Trader takeaways: the Bitcoin buying plan expansion improves “funding capacity” optics, which can support near-term sentiment for BTC-linked equities. But STRC’s structure may add ongoing dividend-like obligations and raise dilution/credit-concern risk if issuance does not translate into timely BTC accumulation.
Overall, this change is likely to keep market focus on the cash-flow trade-off between accelerating BTC buying power and managing STRC dividend burden and dilution.
Neutral
Bullish optics improve because the Bitcoin buying plan expansion increases headline “funding capacity,” and the shift toward the more liquid STRC may help translate issuance into ongoing BTC accumulation. However, both summaries flag medium-term risks: preferred-stock structures can create dividend-like cash obligations, and added issuance can worsen dilution and credit metrics if BTC purchases don’t keep pace. With Strategy already showing an unrealized loss on its BTC cost basis, traders will likely react by watching whether STRC funding actually sustains net BTC buy flow versus creating cash-stress and equity overhang. Net impact on BTC itself is therefore likely mixed rather than one-directional.