Walt Adds AI Agents for Perpetual Futures Trading

Walt, formerly Wallet in Telegram, is adding AI agents to its perpetual futures trading service. Users can connect Mira, ChatGPT or Claude to review live prices, market news, open positions and liquidation risk, then open or close long and short trades and set take-profit and stop-loss orders. Agents use a dedicated account funded by the user; transfers and withdrawals are restricted, and order execution is off by default. Users set trading instructions and limits, monitor activity and can disconnect an agent at any time. Walt offers more than 50 perpetual futures markets, with 24/7 trading, USDT settlement and leverage of up to 50x. The service launched perpetual futures through decentralized exchange Lighter in April. The latest rollout adds AI-driven execution to Walt’s broader expansion beyond wallet services, including a TON-linked agent, Mira. Walt has not disclosed the agent feature’s fees, availability, leverage limits or execution venue details. For traders, AI agents could make automated crypto trading more accessible, but they may misread instructions or handle sudden volatility poorly. Default-off execution and user-defined limits provide safeguards, yet high leverage can magnify losses and trigger rapid liquidation. The launch is a product development rather than a direct catalyst for the price of TON or another token.
Neutral
The news is primarily a product launch by Walt, not a change to the supply, demand or network fundamentals of TON. Mira’s connection to the TON ecosystem may increase visibility for TON-related projects, but the summaries provide no evidence of direct token demand, integration-driven usage or revenue flowing to TON. As a result, a lasting price effect on TON is uncertain. In the short term, traders may react to the AI and TON association, but the feature’s launch alone offers little basis for a sustained directional move. In the longer term, broader use of AI-assisted trading could bring more users to crypto derivatives, though that would not necessarily translate into buying pressure for TON. High leverage and automated execution could amplify losses during volatile periods and add to liquidation-driven market swings, but those risks apply across the supported markets rather than pointing to a specific TON price direction. Overall, the direct price impact on TON is neutral.