Workflow agent “outside-in” build guide: dual-loop design and tool selection
O’Reilly Radar published a July 20, 2026 session recap with AI consultant John Berryman on how to build a workflow agent using a simple “two-loop” pattern.
In Berryman’s framing, an agent is a large language model wrapped in two loops. The outer loop handles back-and-forth messaging with the user (like chatbots). The inner loop lets the model choose and run tools, turning an assistant into an agent. He argues the structure has stayed stable since 2023, while tools and instructions have improved enough to support real products.
He recommends an “outside in” development approach: build traditional software first (UI, data model, non-AI components), then define the AI input/output requirements. Next, fake the agent with a stub to verify integration. Replace the stub with a minimal real agent that uses Pydantic’s agent plus an AI reviewer, and enforce structured output with validation.
For tools, he suggests starting small—read, write, edit, and shell access—so the agent can extend capabilities when needed (e.g., running curl for research). Instead of coding a state machine, write the agent’s context, decision criteria, and step-by-step workflow in natural language, and embed checklists so the agent confirms completion or fails fast.
Berryman also predicts a shift from purpose-built apps toward more general agents that work across tools and interfaces on a user’s behalf.
Neutral
This article is a technical product-building recap about AI agents (architecture and development workflow). It does not mention any cryptocurrency, token economics, protocols, exchanges, or regulatory decisions. As a result, it is unlikely to drive direct spot or derivatives flows.
Market impact is therefore best treated as neutral. Traders typically react to crypto-specific catalysts such as ETF flows, major protocol upgrades, large exchange listings/delistings, court rulings, or macro shocks. By contrast, this “agent” discussion is more relevant to the broader AI/software tooling stack than to crypto fundamentals.
In the short term, it may have minimal sentiment effect for AI-related narratives (for example, tokens tied to AI infrastructure), but without explicit tickers or network-level milestones, any price response would be speculative and likely small. In the long term, increased adoption of agentic workflows could indirectly support demand for AI infrastructure and developer activity; however, that would still require concrete crypto-linked developments (token launches, integrations, partnerships, or on-chain usage) to become tradable.
Overall: no direct linkage to market stability or liquidity changes—neutral.