XRP Builder Rejects Price Calls, Points to XRPL Data Tools
XRP builder Cauliman dismissed public XRP price forecasts, arguing that “silence” is more meaningful than bold targets. He said his daily work building on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) shows stronger conviction than community guesswork—especially as XRP has been weak while influencers continue posting extreme long-term numbers (including claims of $1,000 XRP).
Cauliman also said he does not publish XRP price predictions, citing his focus on products that help users read and use XRPL data. His ecosystem, House of Cauliman (founded 2023), now includes ~11 XRPL projects across data, wallets, trading tools, education, and collectibles.
Key projects highlighted:
- MONOLITH: an on-chain “Wall of Record” where users spend XRP to claim permanent grid coordinates, minting a Coordinate Deed NFT recorded on XRPL.
- AUGUR: a non-custodial wallet intelligence and chain-oracle tool that summarizes XRPL wallet activity (inflows/outflows, fees, token/NFT activity, AMM transactions, and balance changes).
Market context: XRP remains under pressure amid broader market declines and ETF-related weakness, while XRPL usage indicators continue to rise. Reported data included a 35.3% increase in daily XRPL transactions in Q1 2026 and a 124.1% quarter-over-quarter rise in XRPL RWA market cap to $2.25B.
For traders, this reinforces a split between XRP price sentiment and XRPL activity. The XRP builder’s message may temper hype-driven expectations, but it doesn’t directly change near-term catalysts.
Neutral
The news is not a direct bullish or bearish catalyst for XRP price. Instead, it’s a credibility/positioning signal from an XRPL builder: Cauliman rejects public XRP price calls and points traders to ledger-based products (wallet intelligence, trading/data utilities, and XRPL-native collectibles). Historically, when major token figures downplay price targets while emphasizing network usage, markets often see short-term sentiment cooling (less hype) but longer-term support if activity metrics remain strong.
In the short term, XRP is still described as weak due to broader market pressure and ETF-related factors, so the immediate impact on price is likely limited—traders may fade “moon” narratives like extreme long-term targets. In the long term, if rising XRPL transactions and RWA growth continue, the activity-driven thesis can help stabilize downside and improve risk/reward for holders. The split between weak XRP price and stronger XRPL usage suggests a watch-and-wait setup: confirm whether network growth eventually translates into renewed demand for XRP.