ZK Technical Analysis: Downside structure below $0.02, key breaks for $0.0140

ZK Technical Analysis (Apr 4, 2026) dey show say ZK still dey trade for bearish market structure (LH/LL) and e dey consolidate for $0.01–$0.02 range, round $0.0173. Momentum still weak: Supertrend still bearish, RSI(14) dey below 40 (~39.2) and e dey drift towards oversold, while MACD histogram negative. For bullish shift, need BOS (break of structure) above $0.02, wey align wit EMA20/Supertrend resistance. Without that confirmation, bias be range‑bound to bearish. Support dey for $0.0152, and $0.0140 na the decisive level — if ZK Technical Analysis confirm breakdown below $0.0140, bearish CHoCH go strengthen and downside fit extend toward $0.0055. Earlier ZK Technical Analysis (Mar 23, 2026) talk the same — bearish continuation unless daily close reclaim ~$0.0184/$0.02. The latest update add momentum risk near oversold on RSI and refocus the continuation trigger at $0.0140. BTC correlation important for trading: BTC just small up, while ZK drop more (~‑2.87%), show say alt decoupling dey happen. If BTC fall back below about $65k, probability of retest of $0.0140 go rise. Traders advised make dem wait for confirmation: buy the reversal only after decisive BOS above $0.02, or position for continuation on breakdown below $0.0140.
Bearish
Both articles conclude say ZK Technical Analysis still dey dominated by bearish structure (LH/LL) and weak momentum indicators. Short-term reversal never confirm because ZK still under EMA20/Supertrend resistance and e no get the needed BOS above about $0.02. The latest update make the continuation thesis stronger by to emphasise $0.0140 as the key breakdown level: if e lose am e likely go trigger bearish CHoCH and open way for deeper move toward about $0.0055. For the macro cross-asset side, BTC current weakness-to-resumption risk (below about $65k) fit press alts more, increasing the chances say ZK go test $0.0140 instead of reclaiming resistance. Unless traders see a decisive BOS above $0.02, the probability-weighted path favour downside continuation.