Latest Crypto News | Bitcoin, Ethereum and Altcoin Updates

Solana (SOL) is consolidating between about $80 and $95 on the 3-day chart, with traders watching higher-timeframe levels for a breakout. SOL last traded around $82.71/USDT on Binance after a sharp earlier-year drop. The chart highlights $80s as repeated support and ~$95 as resistance. If SOL breaks above $95, a stronger recovery could follow; if it falls below the lower boundary, attention may shift to deeper support near $67.23. Derivatives data suggests fresh demand. On the 1-hour Binance perpetuals view, SOL traded near $80.68 after stabilizing from the selloff. The open interest rebounded to above 10 million and net long positions turned upward, indicating more participants are opening new longs rather than only closing shorts. The post cited that “long position buying and OI on $SOL are increasing,” implying renewed buying pressure around the $80 area. However, rising open interest and longs do not confirm a trend reversal by themselves. If price fails to hold the range, higher leverage can increase liquidation risk. For traders, the key watch is whether SOL can reclaim and hold above $95, or whether support at $80/then ~$67.23 gives way.

Talos has added support for Ondo Finance tokenized assets, integrating Ondo Global Markets into its institutional trading and portfolio technology. Through Talos’s existing connection to Gate.io, eligible institutional clients outside the United States can gain on-chain exposure to tokenized real-world assets without direct onboarding with Ondo. Ondo Global Markets is now live on Talos and provides access to tokenized assets issued by Ondo via Gate.io liquidity. These assets are designed for institutional-grade pricing and liquidity and operate across Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain. Access is available 24/5, aligning with traditional market hours. In the initial phase, Talos clients route orders through Gate.io’s liquidity for immediate trading and distribution. Over time, Talos and Ondo plan a direct API integration to streamline access across trading, portfolio management, and risk systems. Key stakeholders cited by the firms include Katie Wheeler (MD, Global Partnerships at Ondo Finance) and Drew Forman (SVP and Head of Strategy at Talos). Both frame the partnership as reducing “zero-friction” barriers for banks, brokers, and asset managers to trade tokenized real-world assets using existing institutional workflows. SEO keywords used in context: Talos, Ondo tokenized assets, institutional crypto, Gate.io, tokenized real-world assets, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain.

Shiba Inu (SHIB) has completed an hourly golden cross, a bullish technical signal often used by momentum traders. After the crossover, SHIB is reported near $0.0000060, up 4.7% in 24 hours, with daily trading volume rising 43.8%. The article links the SHIB golden cross to renewed buying pressure and suggests it may support upside over the next few hours to days. In Ripple (XRP) coverage, XRP payments on the XRP Ledger jumped 410.7% day-over-day to 624,637,585 transactions (from about 122M the prior day). The piece frames this as a surge in network activity that could precede a price breakout. XRP’s price is described as stabilizing around the $1.30 level, with trading activity largely in the green. For Bitcoin (BTC), a whale transfer is highlighted as potentially bearish: 1,102 BTC (worth over $74 million) was moved to Binance, which typically implies an intention to sell (exchange deposits). The same holder had bought in mid-2025 and endured periods of consolidation before Bitcoin’s later highs. Overall, the SHIB golden cross plus XRP on-chain activity are supportive, but the BTC whale’s exchange move adds near-term risk. Traders may watch follow-through in SHIB momentum and whether XRP’s activity surge translates into higher prices, while monitoring BTC sell-pressure risk.

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance’s token, FET, is down more than 8% and traded near $0.229. Traders are watching a “make-or-break” support around $0.2270. Derivatives data (CoinGlass) show bearish positioning in the short term. The FET liquidation map highlights heavy downside interest near $0.224 versus upside interest near $0.238. Long-leveraged exposure is about $294K, while short-leveraged exposure is higher at roughly $794K, suggesting bears currently control near-term momentum. A technical setup on the 4-hour chart points to a descending triangle and potential breakdown risk. If FET fails to hold $0.2270 and a 4-hour candle closes below it, the article expects an additional ~10% drop toward $0.20. An expert also cited deeper downside targets at $0.1737. Momentum remains weak: ADX is about 13.22, well below the 25 level often associated with stronger trend direction. On-chain context is mixed. Nansen data indicates long-term holders may be accumulating, with top 100 addresses increasing holdings by 2.04% over the past week, while exchange reserves fell 1.40%—a potential offset to the current sell pressure. For traders, the immediate trigger is whether FET can defend $0.2270. A breakdown could accelerate downside, while a hold may set up a later relief move if FET reclaims resistance and breaks out above the descending trendline.

Oracle (ORCL) is cutting thousands of jobs while continuing to invest in cloud and AI infrastructure. The market is watching ORCL stock for whether the layoffs are a warning or a cost reset meant to protect margins. Oracle’s fiscal Q3 results earlier in March were strong, with 22% year-over-year revenue growth and adjusted EPS of $1.79. However, reports say the job cuts may span multiple divisions and that Oracle is also slowing hiring in cloud-related areas. The core concern is rising data-center costs tied to its aggressive cloud and AI buildout. On the chart, ORCL stock has weakened. It fell from $155.52 on March 19 to $138.80 by March 30, after slipping below the mid-March support zone near $150. Traders are now focused on whether ORCL stock can hold the low-$140s. A reclaim above $145 is framed as an early sign that selling momentum is fading. If ORCL stock cannot defend the low-$140s, rallies may be treated as short-term bounces rather than a sustained reversal. For traders, the layoffs could act as a near-term catalyst for risk sentiment, but the market is likely to wait for clearer evidence that AI spending can be managed without margin damage.

Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has ordered Texas Senate committees to study crypto and blockchain as part of the state’s 2026 interim legislative priorities, ahead of the next session in January. The directive includes a focus on “closing gambling loopholes.” Key items in the charges include analyzing the “sudden inundation of prediction market gambling” and how platforms may use federal rules to bypass Texas election and gambling prohibitions. Patrick also asked lawmakers to review Texas’s coordination with federal crypto and blockchain rules and to examine “crypto kiosks” in the state. Texas is known for strict gambling laws, with sports betting largely limited to casinos on Native American reservations and the state lottery system. The move comes as other U.S. states have sued prediction market platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket over sports and election wagers; Texas was not among the plaintiffs as of Tuesday. Separately, Patrick’s charges call for evaluating the impact of AI on the Texas workforce and its effects on economic competitiveness. The announcement follows reports that Google may support a multibillion-dollar Anthropic data center expansion in Texas. Market context: this is a regulatory and policy study agenda rather than an immediate ban or enforcement action, but it can raise expectations of tighter oversight around crypto-linked financial products, prediction-market derivatives, and election-related betting structures. Traders may watch for follow-on bills, committee hearings, and compliance timelines during the 2026 interim period and the January 2027 session.

The Pentagon is reportedly seeking about $200B in supplemental funding for a potential Iran war, on top of a record ~$900B annual defense budget, as the U.S. pushes for financing help from Arab states. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said, “it takes money to kill bad guys,” while reporting also indicates Iran may demand war reparations and compensation. For crypto traders, the key driver is macro: a higher probability of sustained fiscal strain raises concerns about U.S. debt, inflation risk, and the dollar’s outlook. This can pressure high-beta coins and increase short-term volatility, feeding a broader risk-off tone. However, if investors conclude the U.S. is “running out of cash” or that partners won’t absorb the cost, some market participants may rotate toward perceived hedges. That includes bitcoin and gold, supporting the “flight-to-safety” narrative even if crypto markets remain choppy. Overall, crypto markets are being asked to reprice geopolitical risk, the debt trajectory, and currency dynamics in real time, with the $200B figure as the immediate catalyst.

On Mar 31, 2026, on-chain analyst Axel Adler Jr. warned that Bitcoin’s S&P correlation turning negative does not mean BTC is gaining “independence” from equities. The key message is that Bitcoin’s S&P correlation can flip due to timing and bounce patterns, even while risk assets remain pressured. Adler cited two metrics. First, the 13-week BTC–S&P correlation recently turned negative, but this mainly reflects that BTC and the S&P 500 are moving less in sync—not that Bitcoin is strengthening versus stocks. Second, the BTC/S&P price ratio (a relative-performance gauge) has been declining since the start of 2026. That indicates Bitcoin is underperforming the S&P 500 and is still priced as a higher-risk asset with greater drawdown potential. He said true “decoupling” would require a sustained upside reversal in the BTC/S&P price ratio, not a one-week anomaly. Adler’s conclusion: confirmation of a new regime is not present. Price context: BTC briefly dipped to just under $65,000, then rebounded above $68,000, but was rejected amid the U.S.–Iran geopolitical situation. At the time of writing, BTC traded around $67,000 (down ~1.4% in 24h; ~-6.5% over 7d). The article frames Bitcoin’s S&P correlation shift as a misleading read for traders, while macro pressure remains the dominant driver.

Global markets jumped on March 31, 2026 after reports that President Trump signaled a willingness to pause U.S. military operations in Iran, even with the Strait of Hormuz only partially closed. Iran also hinted at negotiation if specific demands are met. U.S. stocks rallied sharply: the S&P 500 rose about 2.4% to ~6,496, the Nasdaq gained ~3.3% to ~21,475, and the Dow added ~2.1%. Around 77% of stocks finished higher, suggesting a broad “risk-on” shift. Commodity and rates moved with the headline. WTI crude settled near $101–$102, while Brent hovered around $104–$106. Oil’s inflation threat remains a key risk to future Fed policy. Gold traded roughly $4,500–$4,681 per ounce, and silver rose about 3–7% to ~$73–$75, reflecting lingering safe-haven support even after de-escalation hopes. Bitcoin rose about 1.9% to ~$67,798 after testing ~$68,500, while Ethereum gained ~3.9% to ~$2,096. Bitcoin tracked the equity bounce, as risk appetite improved. Treasury yields eased slightly; the 10-year yield fell to ~4.30–4.31%, helped by comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell that long-term inflation expectations remain “in check.” Traders will watch for the next directional cue from ceasefire progress versus an oil supply shock, since sustained high oil could re-ignite inflation and rates risk. Overall, this headline-driven relief rally leaves investors cautious into Q2.

US prosecutors have charged Maryland resident Jonathan Spalletta in the Uranium Finance hack, alleging he stole about $54m worth of crypto tied to the now-defunct BNB Chain DeFi exchange. The indictment covers two April 2021 attacks. The first (Apr 8) allegedly exploited a smart-contract issue to drain about $1.4m; a reported private settlement returned most funds, leaving roughly $386,000 unrecovered. The second (Apr 28) allegedly exploited a withdrawal coding error, sweeping 26 liquidity pools and stealing about $53.3m in Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), and Uranium’s U92 token. Uranium Finance shut down soon after. Prosecutors also allege Spalletta moved and concealed proceeds using swaps and mixing services, including Tornado Cash. Spalletta faces one count of computer fraud and one count of money laundering, with up to 30 years if convicted. For traders, this Uranium Finance hack case highlights how older DeFi thefts can re-emerge in enforcement after large recoveries—usually more relevant for ecosystem risk sentiment than for near-term BTC or ETH price direction.

Bitcoin treasury firm Nakamoto Holdings (NAKA) is spiraling after a near-total equity wipeout and rising Nasdaq delisting risk. The stock collapsed ~99% from a May peak near $25 to about $0.39. NAKA is now non-compliant after trading below the $1 minimum bid price for 30+ consecutive business days, triggering a 180-day Nasdaq compliance period that ends June 8, 2026. To avoid delisting, NAKA must close above $1 for at least 10 consecutive trading days. In its Q4 reporting, NAKA posted a $142.6M fair-value loss on digital-asset holdings, plus a $10.8M investment loss tied to Metaplanet. Separately, Bull Theory highlighted that NAKA sold roughly $20M of Bitcoin around a ~$70,000 average price versus an original cost basis near ~$118,000, illustrating how a weaker Bitcoin price can erode the treasury model. Financing fragility is compounding the situation. NAKA raised $510M via PIPE and $200M in convertible notes at launch, and later refinanced with a $210M Bitcoin-backed Kraken loan (Dec 2025). With the stock under $1, the PIPE-related share resale overhang and ongoing supply pressure can weigh on sentiment. Traders should treat the Nasdaq delisting timeline and potential liquidity drain as near-term risk factors, even with a sizable BTC treasury as a buffer.

S&P Dow Jones Indices has tokenized its iBoxx US Treasuries Index on the Canton Network, turning a major fixed-income benchmark into onchain-deliverable benchmark data. The tokenized iBoxx US Treasuries index onchain is issued with Kaiko’s market-data technology. Crucially, S&P says the tokenized index is not an investable product. Instead, it is licensed benchmark data, with access and permissions embedded in the token. S&P retains control over who can approve and use the data via “approved product issuers,” enabling institutions to pull end-of-day and intraday levels and supporting compliant integration into blockchain-based finance. For traders, the key relevance is infrastructure: tokenized Treasury benchmarks can reduce friction in DeFi/RWA workflows because US Treasuries remain the dominant collateral onchain. Industry data cited in the article notes Treasuries’ largest share of the roughly $27B tokenized asset market, with more than $12.5B already tokenized. This supports smoother onchain pricing and compliance for upcoming Treasury-linked products, even if no new directly tradable index is launched.

DeFi Technologies (DEFT) said it reported preliminary, unaudited FY2025 results: revenue of $99.1M and net income of $62.7M, both record highs. The company reported FY2025 revenue up 215% year over year and a swing to profit versus the net loss in 2024. For Q4 2025, DeFi Technologies (DEFT) posted revenue of $20.0M and net income of $28.9M, compared with a loss a year earlier. Consensus expectations cited in the report were FY25 revenue of $99.25M and Q4 revenue of $22.19M. After hours, DEFT shares jumped about 37% to $0.7573 following the announcement. The figures come from a company press release ahead of audited results.

Bitget Wallet has integrated the XRP Ledger (XRPL) into its Onchain Payments Matrix, giving its 90 million users access to XRP transfers and RLUSD transactions. The update is positioned as a payments-focused expansion rather than just crypto storage. According to Bitget, users can send and receive XRP and RLUSD on XRPL, swap XRPL assets across multiple chains, and use RLUSD fiat on/off ramps. The wallet will also support XRPL-based applications directly inside the interface, tying XRPL assets into swaps, merchant checkout, cards, and bank transfer rails. Ripple says RLUSD is issued natively on both XRP Ledger and Ethereum, is backed by segregated cash and cash-equivalent reserves, and is redeemable 1:1 for US dollars. Bitget plans to pair the rollout with limited-time incentives intended to encourage RLUSD usage, liquidity, and activity across XRPL applications. For XRPL, Bitget adds another major retail distribution channel at a time when the network is increasingly emphasizing low-cost payments and card-based spending. For traders, the key near-term watchpoints are RLUSD adoption signals and XRP flow/volume changes tied to wallet-driven payment and merchant use cases.

Bitcoin price prediction signals growing caution as BTC shows a corrective rebound on lower time frames, while a Bitcoin 3-day SMA cross suggests a potential final selloff. Short-term setup (1H chart): BTC is reacting around the $64,974 support. The bounce appears corrective, forming a three-wave structure (often seen as a temporary recovery rather than a new bullish impulse). Resistance is clustered at $68,300–$70,300 (near Fib 0.5/0.618/0.786). If BTC fails to hold above $64,974, the corrective rebound thesis weakens and a deeper decline becomes more likely. Upside resistance targets are cited near $71,759 and then ~$75,967. Higher-time-frame warning (3-day chart): Ali Charts highlights that when the 50 SMA crosses the 200 SMA in prior bear-market bottoms, BTC typically still falls sharply again before a stronger bull cycle begins. Historical parallels referenced include 2014, 2018, and 2022, where the cross appeared before the “final washout” phase (i.e., the warning tends to precede capitulation rather than perfectly mark the exact bottom). Bitcoin price prediction takeaway: traders should treat the current rebound as unconfirmed while watching the $64,974 line closely. A clean hold may allow another push toward resistance, but a breakdown would increase odds of one more volatility-driven reset before any stronger uptrend.

Ethereum (ETH) price prediction signals a high-risk setup as two warning factors emerge at the same time. First, ETH RSI momentum on the daily chart appears to be weakening after a recovery attempt from February’s sharp drop. The price is forming a wedge-like structure: it makes slightly higher lows, but capped resistance near ~$2,200 remains unbroken, so momentum may fade before a clearer breakdown. Second, a major ETH liquidation heatmap highlights a dense liquidation cluster just above the market around $2,100. This zone can act like a liquidity magnet. If ETH moves into ~$2,100, forced liquidations from leveraged positions could accelerate volatility and trigger a sharper reaction. Key levels traders are watching: support/liquidity around $2,000–$2,030 and another pocket near $1,900–$1,950, with deeper reference to the February low around $1,750–$1,800 if the wedge fails. On the upside, reclaiming and closing above the horizontal resistance near $2,200 would undermine the bearish ETH price prediction thesis and may turn the pattern into a stronger rebound. Overall, the ETH price prediction leans bearish while price tests support and RSI momentum deteriorates, with $2,100 positioned as the critical pressure point for the next move.

Bitcoin (BTC) is stalling in a tight mid-$60k range, trading roughly between $66,037 and $68,130, and failing to break higher amid layered moving-average resistance. Technical signals skew bearish: all major EMAs and SMAs sit above spot price, including the 10-day EMA (~$67,832) and 10-day SMA (~$68,138), while higher resistance bands persist at $68,000–$69,000 and $71,000–$73,000. Momentum remains neutral to weak. The RSI is near 42, the CCI is around -104, and MACD is negative (about -947 points), pointing to subdued trend strength rather than a strong reversal. Broader sentiment also remains fragile, with the Crypto Fear & Greed Index spending much of the quarter in “extreme fear.” Market structure is the key swing factor for Bitcoin in the next sessions. A sustained breakout and hold above $68,000–$69,000 on rising volume would be needed to flip the narrative toward recovery. Conversely, rejection followed by a decisive break below $65,000–$64,800 would likely confirm continuation toward the low-$60,000 support zone. Recent price action shows BTC rolling over from lower highs in the mid-$70,000s into the mid-$60,000s, consistent with a “neutral-to-bearish” posture.

Cardano’s Midnight network officially went live on Mar. 29, giving Charles Hoskinson’s team its first production test of the argument that public blockchains can’t reach regulated finance, identity, and business use without privacy and compliance built in from the start. Midnight launches with a curated, federated operator set and an initial “NIGHT/DUST” dual-token design. The article frames this as a bridge from Cardano’s governance/interoperability layer to an identity-and-privacy layer aimed at institutions that can’t tolerate fully transparent ledgers. Key stats and context: - Cardano valuation: above $9.1B market cap (Electric Capital: 672 active developers). - Cardano DeFi usage is light for its size: about $134M TVL on DeFiLlama, ~$47M stablecoins, and < $2,000 daily chain fees. Midnight’s institutional thesis is tied to privacy gap dynamics. The architecture targets enabling compliance/solvency proofs without broadcasting sensitive data. Developer onboarding includes “Compact” (TypeScript-influenced). Near-term enterprise involvement is currently at proof-of-concept stage, including Monument Bank (up to £250M tokenized retail deposits), Worldpay (USDG stablecoin payments PoC), MoneyGram (confidential payments settlement exploration), plus node/infrastructure partners such as Google Cloud, Blockdaemon, Pairpoint by Vodafone, eToro, and Bullish. What traders should watch over the next ~90 days: - Concrete issuance milestones from Monument and/or public demos/workflows from Worldpay, Bullish, or MoneyGram. - Progress toward broader community-driven block production later in 2026. Bottom line: Midnight is a plausible “privacy for regulated finance” play, but real adoption signals are still unproven—so the market reaction may hinge on measurable product milestones, not just token headlines.

Magic Eden will deprecate its native wallet and move to an “export-only” mode starting April 1. The Magic Eden wallet will allow users to export private keys/seed phrases, but it will stop full functionality on May 1. After that date, the wallet is expected to be shut down with no practical way to recover private keys, so users are urged not to delete the app until they export. From April 1, the Magic Eden wallet will only support key/seed exports and will be removed from app stores. It will not support new transactions or other wallet activities. Magic Eden also warns that the only wallet version is the one already downloaded; new wallets can’t be reinstalled or recovered. The company previously discontinued its EVM and Bitcoin wallets on its site, tied to marketplace withdrawals and cut-off deadlines (including a March 27 API/market shut-down timeline). Users are advised to export before April 1 or import keys into another wallet to move assets safely; seed-phrase storage is presented as the safety fallback. Separately, Magic Eden says the ME token remains central. Stakers continue to receive USDC rewards, and Magic Eden has a ME buyback program. ME is also planned to be used in the Dicey app, with ongoing token unlocks (noted as 28.4% awaiting unlock). Trading context: ME is around $0.09 near an all-time low. For traders, the key takeaway is operational risk around custody access (export deadlines) and the ongoing shift from NFT marketplaces toward Dicey/entertainment—factors that can affect flows, sentiment, and ME demand in the near term.

The provided article content is not accessible. Instead of reporting crypto market developments, it shows a Bloomberg anti-bot/“Are you a robot?” screen requesting JavaScript and cookies, with a block reference ID. As a result, traders cannot verify the claimed insights about crypto weekend trading platforms being “prescient.” No specific cryptocurrencies, prices, on-chain metrics, companies, dates, or actionable trading details are included in the accessible text.

Bitcoin is trading near a historically significant Bitcoin buy zone around the $64K–$65K demand area, with $76K flagged as the next resistance target. BTC price was about $66.2K at the time of reporting. CryptoQuant data cited in the article shows a spike in large Bitcoin deposits moving onto Binance. Such exchange inflows often reflect potential selling intent, even if execution is not immediate. At the same time, the Exchange Whale Ratio increased across exchanges, indicating that whales are controlling a larger share of exchange-related inflows. This creates a mixed setup for the Bitcoin buy zone: long-term accumulation signals from price positioning versus short-term distribution risk from rising exchange balances. The piece argues that if Spot demand absorbs the incoming supply, BTC could stabilize and attempt a move toward the $76K resistance level, likely requiring strong Spot Volume. However, continued whale deposits could raise sell-side pressure. In that case, BTC may be pulled back toward the $65K demand area, and a breakdown below $65K could weaken the accumulation structure. Bottom line for traders: Bitcoin buy zone support is in focus, but whale-driven Binance inflows and the Exchange Whale Ratio suggest heightened risk of sell-offs near key levels.

A crypto commentator on X claims the CLARITY Act—meant to separate commodities and securities in the digital-asset sector and protect developer activity and self-custody—has been delayed twice. The post says the bill passed the U.S. House on bipartisan support (294–134), but faced Senate resistance linked to “repeated interventions by Coinbase.” The timeline cited: (1) January 2026, when Brian Armstrong reportedly withdrew support before a scheduled markup, canceling progress; (2) March 2026, when a White House compromise failed to move the CLARITY Act forward. The commentator argues the core dispute is stablecoin yield rules, with Coinbase reportedly earning about $800M annually from USDC-linked rewards. It suggests Coinbase’s pushback on yield-bearing stablecoins stalled broader regulatory clarity covering tokenized securities and CFTC oversight. For traders, the post ties the delay to XRP’s history of prolonged U.S. SEC uncertainty and notes Ripple’s RLUSD is positioned as compliance-focused to avoid the current yield controversy. The author warns that if the CLARITY Act does not advance before May, the midterm election cycle could further delay or end the process—potentially extending regulatory ambiguity for the whole crypto market, including XRP.

Magic Eden’s multi-chain crypto wallet (ME Wallet) is entering an export-only mode tomorrow and will be removed from app stores. It will remain export-only until May 1, after which functionality may fully stop. For traders holding SOL in the Magic Eden Wallet, the key risk is access loss: if you lose the device or downloaded app, you may also lose access to the wallets. Magic Eden advises users to export private keys before May 1. The wallet’s end-of-support also aligns with an earlier plan to wind down wallet operations (with app-store support ending around April 1). For users of Ethereum (seed phrase restoration may work), the article notes that Solana addresses can differ, so exporting the private key is the safer path to retain access to SOL. Separately, Magic Eden has been shifting away from NFTs toward crypto gambling and launched Dicey in January. Its native token ME is reported down sharply versus its December 2024 high, reinforcing that the platform’s strategy change and wallet wind-down could weigh on sentiment. Key deadlines: export before the May 1 cutoff; app store availability ends as the export-only mode starts tomorrow.

Stablecoin startup P2P.me, backed by Coinbase Ventures and Multicoin Capital, apologized after it used Polymarket to speculate on its own fundraising outcomes—surprising major backers who were reportedly unaware of the bets. The move drew backlash because Polymarket’s rules were updated around the same period to curb insider trading by people with influence over event outcomes. P2P.me said the position was meant to show “conviction” publicly, but acknowledged it “created confusion and hurt trust.” The company reported profit of less than $15,000 from the Polymarket wagers, while emphasizing that even a small payoff can have outsized consequences. The bets were tied to MetaDAO’s Solana-based fundraising and governance platform. Some bets would pay if $140 million in funding was committed to P2P.me, while others hinged on a $6 million milestone. MetaDAO’s co-founder Prohp3t said MetaDAO would have asked P2P.me to avoid Polymarket had it known in advance, describing it as an overly aggressive “guerrilla marketing” attempt. To protect investors, MetaDAO said it would facilitate refunds for those exiting before P2P.me’s public fundraise ends Tuesday; a spokesperson told Decrypt that $20,000 in refunds had been requested out of $6.7 million committed. For traders, the immediate takeaway is reputational and regulatory sensitivity around prediction markets: further scrutiny could increase compliance requirements and reduce liquidity or participation in similar “insider-adjacent” strategies.

Shiba Inu burn rate has collapsed toward zero as March ends. On March 31, only 906.4 SHIB were burned—one of the month’s lowest single-day totals—down from earlier spikes. The Shiba Inu burn rate decline is significant because community burns have long been used as a supply-reduction narrative. Despite the slowdown, a major cumulative milestone was reached: half of the circulating SHIB supply has now been permanently removed from circulation (via long-term burn events). Burn activity showed two clear peaks in March: 84,094,174 SHIB burned on Feb 28, and 54,693,900 SHIB burned on Mar 15. After mid-month, the rate faded sharply—15,911,451 SHIB on Mar 25, then just 906.4 SHIB on Mar 31. The burn tracker also changed its display, removing percentage-change metrics, which may reduce day-to-day transparency. Separately, Shibarium entered what the @Shibizens team calls a “clean stabilization phase” after a backend reindexing and infrastructure upgrade. Over the 48 hours before the update, Shibarium mainnet logged about 1,230 transactions per day, a steep fall from a Mar 26 peak of 10,940 daily transactions. Author: Newton Gitonga.

A Theta Labs article argues that a “research tax” is increasingly hurting public-sector AI research. It says universities have fallen from producing ~65% of the most compute-intensive AI models in the early 2010s to about ~10% in the early 2020s, as commercial labs attract capital, infrastructure, and talent. The piece highlights a resource gap: in a cited survey, 85% of academics reported no cloud compute budget, and 66% rated cluster satisfaction at 3/5 or below. Researchers reported GPU wait times of up to 2–3 days and limited multi-node capability, with 41% reporting they have no multi-node capability at all. It also claims only 17% reported pre-training models, because the economics make full models financially unattractive or infeasible. The article links these constraints to “research tax” outcomes: delayed work, abandoned projects, and talent attrition. It notes that by 2020, nearly 70% of new AI PhDs moved into private-sector careers. It cites disparity examples from large compute purchases (e.g., Princeton vs Meta and Microsoft) and references Stanford’s December 2024 paper on expanding academia’s role in public-sector AI. On solutions, Theta positions decentralized “supply side compute” to give universities access to idle compute at lower cost. It includes testimonials from Yonsei, Peking, Ajou, and others describing lower scaling costs and improved feasibility. Overall, the “research tax” narrative frames a structural shift of AI innovation from academia toward for-profit labs, with Theta advocating decentralized GPU infrastructure as mitigation.

Bitcoin (BTC) is holding above $66,000 and has reclaimed the $68,000 level after Donald Trump hinted at ending the US–Israel–Iran war without fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The move came alongside strength in US equities, with S&P 500 gains. However, derivatives data point to caution. Bitcoin two-month futures show only a ~2% annualized premium versus spot, a level that implies limited demand for bullish leverage. Even when BTC pushed above $71,000, investors did not turn broadly bullish. Macro factors may be weighing on sentiment. Traders reduced expectations for US Federal Reserve rate cuts; CME FedWatch indicates less than 10% odds of a July cut (down from 75% a month earlier). Higher yields and tighter financial conditions can weigh on risk assets and growth. Options pricing shows pronounced fear. On Deribit, 30-day put options traded at about a 17% premium versus call options, which is typically consistent with extreme downside hedging. The article notes this comes despite Bitcoin’s already ~23% decline in 2026. While some headlines around quantum-computing claims (ECDLP) briefly resurfaced, the market appears to have quickly dismissed those fears. The bigger driver for bearish positioning appears to be expectations around economic stimulus and the view of Bitcoin as a risky asset rather than a safe haven. Overall, Bitcoin’s spot resilience contrasts with bearish BTC futures/options positioning, suggesting traders are prepared for downside even if $66K holds for now.

TAO has been consolidating above $300 after a volatile March rally tied to Bittensor’s AI narrative. Today TAO trades around $311–$317, down about 3% on the day, but still strongly up for the month after briefly testing near $350. Traders on X, including Michaël van de Poppe, described the pullback as “normal price behavior” and suggested a potential dip-buying zone in the coming weeks rather than a full trend reversal. The market backdrop remains supported by Bittensor’s decentralized AI marketplace, where machine-learning inference/training incentives keep TAO central to AI-crypto positioning. On-chain/valuation context: TAO’s market cap is reported around $3–3.5B with circulating supply just above 10M TAO, implying fully diluted value in the roughly $6.5B–$7B range at current prices. The article also notes Bittensor’s capped 21M TAO supply and halving-style issuance, with TAO still more than 50% below its all-time high near $750. For traders, the key takeaway is that TAO’s post-halving consolidation above $300 looks more like a pause than a ceiling, but leverage and sentiment can reset quickly after sharp AI-related spikes. This can keep short-term volatility elevated while sustaining a constructive medium-term bias if $300 holds.

Health wearables firm WHOOP has closed a $575 million funding round at a $10.1 billion valuation, led by Collaborative Fund. The company says this capital positions it closer to an IPO. WHOOP’s investor roster includes major institutions such as Qatar Investment Authority and Mubadala, plus Macquarie Capital, Glade Brook, IVP, Foundry, Affinity Partners, and Bullhound Capital. Healthcare heavyweight backers Abbott and Mayo Clinic also joined, supporting WHOOP’s shift from elite athlete performance tracking toward preventive health. WHOOP’s CEO Will Ahmed announced the round on X and highlighted recent product progress: medical clearances over the past 12 months and new blood testing features. The company describes its platform as a “preventive health platform” using continuous biometric data, advanced analytics, and AI for real-time health insights. Athlete participation is also prominent. Investors named in the round include Cristiano Ronaldo, LeBron James, Rory McIlroy, Virgil van Dijk, and Mathieu van der Poel. Overall, WHOOP’s $575M raise reinforces cross-sector confidence as it builds an AI-driven healthcare offering, combining mainstream medical validation with the brand’s sports credibility.