Latest Crypto News | Bitcoin, Ethereum and Altcoin Updates

Dogecoin (DOGE) is showing short-term weakness near $0.09185, but analysts cite a hidden bullish divergence that could trigger a major upside move. At the time of reporting, DOGE traded around $0.09191, down 2.81% in 24 hours. The price slipped after trading steadily in the $0.0940–$0.0950 range, fell toward ~$0.0910, then bounced to ~$0.0930. However, lower highs and unstable momentum suggest sellers still control the near-term trend. The $0.0930–$0.0940 zone is acting as resistance, so traders may watch for a reclaim of $0.0940 to improve odds of continuation. The bullish thesis hinges on two technical levels. First, hidden bullish divergence is forming: price holds higher lows above the ~$0.09 support area, while the momentum oscillator prints lower lows—signalling weakening bearish pressure. If the breakout develops, analyst Javon Marks suggests continuation could take DOGE up more than 350%, targeting levels above $0.44. Second, DOGE is defending the long-term 5-year demand base around $0.07867. Analysts (including “Crypto Lens”) argue this zone has previously preceded explosive expansions (+173%, +180%, +421%). If DOGE remains above $0.07867, the setup could evolve into a multi-month rally.

AMBCrypto reports that Shiba Inu’s bear run may continue for another 7 months, potentially lasting until September 2026. The article says the broader memecoin complex has struggled as Bitcoin momentum has been weak in recent days. Price-wise, the top memecoins by market cap were mostly flat on the week: SHIB and PEPE were within 2% of their prices a week ago, Memecoin (M) gained about 10%, and DOGE fell roughly 3.8%. SHIB was down around 0.51% week-over-week. To explain why bulls may struggle, two on-chain-style metrics are highlighted. First, “percent supply in profit” for SHIB sits at just 3.07%. The piece notes this is near bear-market profitability levels: October 2023 was 3.93% (a recent low), and February 2026 reached 2.86%—suggesting holders are not seeing strong profit conditions. Second, the MVRV ratio and its deviation from the all-time mean are framed as an extreme bearish regime. During the 2022 bear market, MVRV stayed roughly 0.5 to 1 standard deviation below the mean from May 2022 to January 2023. If the current pattern repeats, the article argues Shiba Inu’s bear run could extend toward September 2026. Even potential bullish catalysts—like a proposed T. Rowe Price ETF that could involve volatile assets such as Shiba Inu—may not be enough to reverse the trend. Net takeaway for traders: Shiba Inu’s bear run signals risk of continued downside/range-bound action, where rallies toward swing highs could behave more like sell opportunities than breakout trades.

RSR Technical Analysis for 22 Mar 2026 shows RSR trading around $0.001826 (+1.33% in the last 24s) with a broader bearish backdrop. The article notes RSR momentum is weakening but not yet fully oversold: RSI(14) is about 42.79, staying in the neutral zone (40–60). MACD is reported neutral, with the histogram balanced near the zero line and narrowing bars, suggesting compressed momentum and possible volatility soon. Price structure remains downtrend/sideways: RSR is below short-term EMA20 (dynamic resistance), and the Supertrend indicator signals bearish conditions. Key levels are highlighted for traders: support at $0.001800, $0.001700, and $0.001600, with a main recovery hinge near $0.0015–$0.0013. Resistance markers include $0.001900 and an upper zone around $0.0016. The article also flags a multi-timeframe support “cluster,” which could attract bottom buyers if $0.0013–$0.0016 holds. A crucial risk factor is BTC correlation. Bitcoin is cited as down (-2.25% to ~$69,160), and the piece expects RSR to accelerate if BTC breaks its supports (potentially toward $0.0013). Conversely, a reclaim of nearby resistance could trigger a move toward higher levels (the bullish target mentioned is around $0.0023), but confirmation likely requires volume. Overall, RSR Technical Analysis concludes confluence is neutral-bearish: without volume-backed confirmation, the trade outlook favors consolidation with downside risk, particularly if $0.0013 breaks.

On-chain data cited by Arkham shows Ethereum whale “thomasg.eth” has resumed accumulation after a long quiet period. In the past week, the wallet accumulated about $19.5M worth of ETH, including a single transfer of 1,401 ETH (around $3M) about 15 hours ago. The buy pattern looks phased and disciplined, suggesting cautious positioning rather than impulsive chase. In 2021, the same wallet previously peaked at roughly $538M, holding a mix of ETH, WBTC, and DAI—an “OG whale” profile that can influence trading sentiment when it re-enters. For ETH traders, this Ethereum whale activity may modestly support near-term bullish expectations if accumulation continues and ETH supply tightens (especially if coins move off-exchange). However, one wallet’s transactions rarely drives the full market, and broader risk-asset moves and macro factors can still dominate price direction.

Crypto commentator Levi Rietveld said XRP will “print the largest green candle in crypto history,” reflecting bullish expectations for XRP. The article ties the optimism to 2025’s resolution of the SEC v. Ripple Labs case and the subsequent “Clarity Act,” which classifies XRP as a U.S. digital commodity—aimed at reducing regulatory uncertainty and improving institutional participation. It also cites the launch of spot XRP ETFs, reporting over $1.3B in inflows in early 2026, a demand channel that can support price via sustained accumulation. On the charts, analysts point to a three-week stretch of green candles and Fibonacci-based targets around $21.50 for XRP, with higher upside possible under certain adoption scenarios. Risks and constraints remain. The article notes that reaching extreme price levels would require XRP’s market cap to expand to multi-trillion levels. It also flags ecosystem competition: Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin could reduce some XRP reliance, and Ripple’s escrow token releases may affect supply dynamics. After the 2025 legal resolution, the article says short-term pullbacks occurred once expectations ran hot. For traders, the key takeaway is that XRP momentum narratives are being reinforced by regulation, ETF flows, and technical signals—while supply/competition factors could still trigger volatility.

A new survey of South Korean crypto investors suggests fear is rising despite Bitcoin’s rebound toward $76,000. The poll, by Bitcoin World and Cratos, found 37.5% of respondents view the Bitcoin rally as a “fake rally” likely driven by a short squeeze rather than fundamentals. Bearish expectations jumped: 41.3% said Bitcoin may fall or drop sharply over the next week (up from 30.5%). Bullish forecasts rose less, to 35.6% (from 27.3%). On sentiment metrics, 43.2% described the market as “fear” or “extreme fear,” while only 27.3% were optimistic. The article explains a short squeeze mechanism: fast price gains force short sellers to buy back, amplifying upside momentum that may prove unsustainable. It also highlights macro pressure: 28.8% of investors believe global factors—specifically U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions—will dominate Bitcoin’s direction. A smaller bullish minority (19.2%) expects a genuine rebound and potential recovery above $100,000, citing narratives such as Bitcoin ETF adoption and institutional interest. For traders, the key takeaway is that Bitcoin’s price strength is not matched by confidence. With fear-led positioning risk and macro sensitivity increasing, rallies may face faster profit-taking or reversal if derivatives-driven momentum fades.

AI tokens compensation is becoming a mainstream hiring perk in Silicon Valley, as companies start treating compute as part of engineering pay. The idea gained attention after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang suggested engineers could receive AI tokens worth up to half their base salary, framing it as an investment in productivity. Venture capitalist Tomasz Tunguz (Theory Ventures) said startups were already adding inference costs as a “fourth component” of engineering compensation. Using Levels.fyi data, a top-quartile software engineer earning about $375,000 could see an additional $100,000 token budget, lifting the package to roughly $475,000—about 20% tied to compute resources. The driver is the rise of “agentic AI,” which performs autonomous multi-step actions and consumes far more tokens than traditional chat use. Tools like OpenClaw can run continuously and spawn sub-agents, pushing token consumption toward very large daily volumes. Reports from the New York Times describe “tokenmaxxing,” where engineers at firms such as Meta and OpenAI track token usage on internal leaderboards. The pitch is simple: more compute should raise output and value. But critics warn about hidden trade-offs. AI tokens compensation may not vest or appreciate like equity, and could shift pressure onto engineers to deliver proportionally higher results. There are also potential job-security implications if compute effectively replaces human coordination. Bottom line: AI tokens compensation is a workplace-structure story, not a direct crypto catalyst—yet it reinforces the broader AI infrastructure theme that traders increasingly watch.

BARD technical analysis (Mar 22, 2026) shows a 10.94% drop alongside high 24h volume (~$54.22M / $63.73M cited), suggesting strong selling pressure. RSI is reported around the oversold zone (30.55 mentioned), but the article notes possible “hidden accumulation” signals from volume behavior and potential base-building near $0.4318. Key levels highlighted in this BARD technical analysis: supports at $0.4318 (major), then $0.9242 and $0.8026 are referenced as additional support bands; resistances at $0.5086, $0.5757, $1.0788, and higher targets like $1.2323. The preferred short-term range is $0.4318–$0.5757, where traders are urged to wait for volume confirmation. Indicators cited: bearish Supertrend and a negative MACD histogram, but oversold conditions can limit downside if buyers step in near support. Whale/institutional activity is inferred from sudden down-move volume spikes and resistance clustering across timeframes. Bitcoin correlation matters: BTC is said to be down ~2.24% (to ~$69.2k). If BTC stabilizes above ~$70k, BARD may attempt a rebound toward $0.5757 resistance; if BTC falls below ~$65k, BARD is expected to retest $0.4318. Overall, the outlook is bearish yet constrained by oversold RSI, making support-volume confirmation the main trading trigger.

Spot XRP ETFs ended the week slightly green for the first time in March, but the win looked small. Net inflows for the past week were just $636,480, with two days showing $0.00 inflows (March 18 and 19). Earlier in 2026, momentum faded: after total net inflows of $666.61M (November) and $500M (December), January flipped negative with $15.59M inflows and February fell further to $58M. March remained deep in the red so far, with more than $31.5M leaving the funds. Price action also failed to sustain. XRP briefly surged from around $1.42 to over $1.60, hit rejection, then slid back toward ~$1.55. It later dipped below $1.40 before partially rebounding, erasing weekly gains and returning to roughly the same level as last Sunday. An analyst (Ali Martinez) flagged an ascending trendline as a potential “buying opportunity” if XRP taps it again. Overall, XRP ETF flows improved slightly at week-end, but weak net demand and rejection in price keep the near-term setup cautious for traders watching XRP ETF inflow data.

Bitcoin mining economics are deteriorating. CoinDesk data cited puts the average cost to produce 1 BTC at about $88,000, while BTC trades near $69,200—implying roughly a 21% loss per coin (about $19,000) and potential “miner capitulation” pressure. The network also shows stress. Bitcoin mining difficulty fell about 7.8% (second-largest decrease of 2026). Hashrate is down to around 920 EH/s and average block times have stretched to over 12 minutes. The article links the squeeze to rising energy prices and Middle East geopolitical risk, which could further lift electricity costs. If miners sell BTC to fund operations, the added BTC spot supply could weigh on demand. For traders, the key near-term signal is follow-through: if BTC stays below the cost line and difficulty keeps dropping, continued miner selling may increase short-term volatility and pressure spot bids ahead of the next adjustment in early April.

XRP fell about 2.6% to around $1.41 after a late-session breakdown below the $1.44 support. The sell-off came with heavy volume, reportedly more than 3x the daily average, pushing price toward the $1.40 pivot. Traders say XRP remains trapped in a broader downtrend with lower highs since mid-2025. Attempts to rebound have failed below the $1.55–$1.60 resistance zone, suggesting rallies look corrective rather than trend-changing. Bitcoin’s weakness is also cited as a drag on broader crypto recovery, keeping risk appetite cautious. Key levels for XRP traders to watch: $1.40 as immediate support; if it holds, consolidation could form and a retest of $1.44–$1.45 becomes possible. If $1.40 fails, downside risk may extend toward $1.30–$1.32. Volume and momentum will likely decide whether sellers can sustain pressure below $1.44.

Bitcoin (BTC) slid toward $68,000 overnight after U.S. President Trump threatened Iran over the Strait of Hormuz. The move followed a relatively stable Saturday when BTC stayed above $70,000. Trump’s latest statement raised geopolitical risk and quickly hit crypto risk appetite. The article cites reports of shifting U.S. messaging within hours, but the market reaction came to the latest threat tied to Iran’s power plants if the Strait is not fully reopened within 48 hours. BTC fell several thousand dollars from the $70,000–$71,000 area, reaching about $68,200 on Bitstamp/Binance and forming a roughly three-week low. Ethereum (ETH) slipped below $2,100, while XRP dropped under $1.40 before a small rebound. Risk-off pressure was confirmed by derivatives: the total value of liquidated leveraged positions jumped above $240 million within about one hour, after the threat intensified. For traders, this is a clear example of how fast geopolitical headlines can trigger BTC price volatility, accelerate leverage unwind events, and spill over into major altcoins (ETH, XRP).

RUNE technical analysis (22 Mar 2026) flags a weak weekly outlook and continued downtrend control. RUNE closed the week around 0.41–0.42, down ~3.06%, with low volume and no clear accumulation. RSI is in a neutral-bearish zone (daily ~43; weekly ~40), while MACD momentum remains negative, and price is below short-term EMA20 (daily ~0.43). Key levels drive the next trading decision. Support: 0.4072 is the “primordial” inflection point. A breakdown targets 0.3881 first, then 0.3500 and a deeper risk zone near 0.2581. Resistance: 0.4197 is the trigger for a shift. Above that, traders look to 0.4385, then a larger upside objective near 0.5190. Bullish scenario: RUNE reclaims EMA20 and closes above 0.4197, targeting 0.4385 and 0.5190 with improved risk/reward. Bearish scenario: RUNE closes below 0.4072, opening a move toward 0.3881 and lower supports. Bitcoin correlation remains a key catalyst. With BTC down (~-2.16%), the article notes that weakening BTC support can pressure RUNE further (watch BTC ~65k as a RUNE risk trigger and BTC ~72k as a rally resistance reference). Traders are advised to use BTC as a trend filter and keep risk controlled until volume confirms a breakout. Not investment advice.

Crypto analyst Ali Charts (Ali Martinez) says XRP is nearing a long-term weekly ascending trendline that has repeatedly acted as support since around 2020. The current price is shown near $1.41 on the chart. His thesis: when XRP bounces off this trendline, price often resumes upward. Traders are watching for “trendline integrity.” If XRP holds above the ascending line, it may confirm continued upside structure. If XRP breaks below it, the outlook could shift lower and add downside risk. In the comments, traders echoed a conditional setup: hold the level for a potential upside “next leg,” but rejection would hurt and signal pain. The near-term decision likely depends on how XRP behaves over the coming weeks, while the weekly chart framing suggests a macro, not short-term, signal. Disclaimer: This is not financial advice.

Bitcoin options market data and on-chain metrics point to a defensive posture among investors after sharp moves in early 2026. VanEck’s research shows traders are paying more for downside protection while overall volatility cools. In the Bitcoin options market, the put-to-call open interest ratio averaged 0.77 over the past month, peaking at 0.84—the highest since China’s mining ban in June 2021. Put premiums for the month totaled about $685M (down 24% month-over-month), while call premiums were about $562M (down ~12%), keeping the market skew toward hedging. Total option premiums paid translated to a record ~4 bps versus spot volume, and realized volatility fell from 80 to 50 while futures funding rates stayed muted at 2.7%. VanEck also reports a put/call premium ratio of 2.0 for the 30 days ending March 3, 2026. Implied put volatility averaged 66, above realized volatility by 16 points. Historically, this level of defensive skew has been rare and has often coincided with stronger medium-term rebounds over prior cycles. Beyond derivatives, Bitcoin on-chain activity softened: transfer volume fell 31%, daily fees -27%, and daily active addresses -5% (mean transaction fees -40%). Miner profitability is under pressure, with total miner revenues down 11% in the month and mining equities down ~7%. Measured reserve behavior continues: miners hold ~684,000 BTC (-0.5% YoY) and long-term holder transfer activity declines across cohorts.

Anthony Scaramucci (SkiBridge) says Polkadot (DOT) is “quietly rebuilding momentum” despite weakening network activity. He cites recent U.S. SEC guidance that categorizes DOT as a digital commodity similar to BTC and ETH, improving regulatory clarity. Tokenomics are also positioned as a catalyst: DOT’s supply is hard-capped at 2.1 billion, while annual emissions were cut from 120 million DOT to 55 million DOT (about a 53% reduction). Scaramucci also points to the 21Shares Spot DOT ETF, though ETF demand has been weak—only one day of inflows (~$544.5K) and then zero flows for most of March. On-chain and adoption signals look softer. Weekly average active addresses reportedly fell from ~16K to ~5K over the past two years, suggesting declining traction. Market sentiment briefly improved after upgrades: during a positive-sentiment spike, DOT rose about 18%, but the rally faded at the $1.65 area (a Q1 2026 roadblock). If macro uncertainty persists, the article flags $1.23 as a potential downside target. Takeaway for traders: catalysts (SEC clarity, emissions cuts, ETF narrative) compete with deteriorating usage metrics and weak ETF flows. The next move may depend on whether sentiment and demand can offset the drop in active usage.

Legendary cryptographer Nick Szabo warned that Bitcoin’s value depends on uncompromised, trust-minimized security. He said there are “no markets in Bitcoin without Bitcoin security,” implying that any careless developer negligence could degrade or destroy the network’s trust model. Szabo argued that if developers increase reliance on users or third parties to prevent abuse—or if they introduce new attack vectors—Bitcoin’s core value proposition is harmed. His key point: the “nonviolent” security model is peaceful only when the underlying code is implemented correctly. In a separate comment, Szabo also suggested Bitcoin’s use as money is already underway, though mainly outside the West. He referenced March 7, noting that developing countries—often with “worst currencies”—are adopting Bitcoin more as a global currency rather than only a store of value. For traders, the headline risk is governance and implementation risk: protocol changes, tooling, or developer behavior that weaken Bitcoin’s security could affect sentiment. Meanwhile, the “Bitcoin as money” narrative could support longer-term demand, especially if macro conditions in weaker fiat economies continue to push adoption.

According to CoinDesk, Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Iran, threatening strikes on power infrastructure. The weekend reaction saw Bitcoin fall quickly, breaking below $69,200. In 24 hours, Bitcoin was down about 2.2%, and the weekly drop widened to roughly 3.1%. Risk sentiment deteriorated despite the Fed holding rates steady with a dovish tone. Traders avoided large one-way positions as repeated war-related headlines increased downside tail risk. If Iran fails to restore passage through the Strait of Hormuz within the deadline, the conflict could escalate to energy infrastructure. That scenario could further disrupt global oil and gas transportation, with the article citing around 20% of shipments being affected, which may keep pressure on risk assets—including crypto. Altcoins followed Bitcoin lower: Ethereum slid to around $2,114, while XRP, BNB, Solana, and Dogecoin also recorded declines.

Bitcoin erased last week’s rally, sliding to about $69,000 after Donald Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Iran: reopen the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping or face strikes on Iran’s power plants. The escalation from earlier de-escalation talk triggered a fast risk-off move across crypto. Over the past 24 hours, crypto markets saw about $299 million in liquidations, driven primarily by leveraged longs. CoinGlass data cited $254 million (around 85%) from long liquidations; Bitcoin longs accounted for about $122 million and Ether longs about $95.7 million. The most notable single wipeout was a $10 million BTC-USDT swap on OKX. The one-sided positioning followed eight consecutive days of gains into the weekend, making Bitcoin especially vulnerable to headline shocks. Major tokens fell in tandem: ETH -1.8% to $2,114, XRP -2.5% to $1.41, BNB -1.4% to $633, SOL -2.1% to $88.55, and DOGE -2.7% to $0.092. With the 48-hour window ending Monday evening, traders now weigh the possibility of the conflict’s first direct strikes on civilian energy infrastructure. Even though the Federal Reserve recently leaned dovish on rates, war-risk headlines are overpowering macro support, keeping traders defensive and limiting new directional bets around Bitcoin.

KMNO technical analysis (KMNO/USDT) suggests a key decision zone around $0.0208 support and $0.0234 resistance. The market is still in a short-term downtrend: price is below EMA20, Supertrend remains bearish, and RSI sits near neutral (~42.9) without a clear oversold signal. However, a positive MACD histogram and RSI neutrality imply momentum could shift. Upside setup: a clean break above $0.0234, ideally with volume increasing (article cites current 24h volume around ~$2.5M and requires higher participation), plus stronger confirmation from RSI moving above 50 and MACD histogram expansion. Traders would then watch Supertrend flipping bullish and the higher resistance zone near $0.03. Targets mentioned include ~$0.0354 first, then a move toward $0.0460 and potentially $0.05–$0.06 if weekly resistance clears. Downside setup: a high-volume breakdown below $0.0208. This would be reinforced by a bearish shift on momentum (RSI falling toward/under 30 and MACD histogram turning negative), with Supertrend staying bearish and declining volume trends that favor sellers. The article highlights $0.0192 as a key downside protection level; if that fails, the next area mentioned is down toward ~$0.0150 and possibly lower. BTC correlation is a major driver: BTC is cited near $69,230, with key levels around $68,500 support and ~$71,000 resistance. A BTC drop below ~$67,000 could drag KMNO below $0.0208, while strength above ~$70,000 could support an upside attempt toward $0.0234. Overall, the KMNO technical analysis frames near-term volatility and potential fakeouts, with daily/4H closes and volume spikes as the main triggers.

EIGEN is trading near $0.19 in a tight range, with the short-term trend still bearish. Earlier levels highlighted a $0.1690 support and $0.1850 resistance, while the latest update sharpens the decision points to $0.1975 (resistance) and $0.1852 (support). For traders, EIGEN’s setup is two-way: - Bullish trigger: a daily/4H close above $0.1975, with improving EMA20 support plus strengthening RSI/MACD momentum. Targets move to $0.2130 and then $0.24. - Bearish trigger: a close below $0.1852, preferably with volume confirmation, reinforcing the bearish Supertrend/EMA structure. Targets include $0.1720 and deeper downside around $0.0871. Volume and BTC correlation are key. The articles cite BTC as the main driver (roughly 80%+ correlation earlier, ~69,272 in the latest). If BTC loses ~$68,000 support, EIGEN is more likely to break below $0.1852. If BTC reclaims around ~$70,000, it supports the $0.1975 breakout case. Practical takeaway: treat $0.1975 and $0.1852 as the core levels for EIGEN risk management, and wait for confirmed closes and volume spikes to reduce false signals.

The USR stablecoin depegs after an apparent smart contract exploit in Resolv’s minting logic. On-chain analysts (including PeckShield) reported the attacker minted about 80M USR using relatively small capital (with figures cited around ~$50M and ~$30M across multiple large mints). The USR stablecoin price briefly collapsed to roughly $0.2–$0.25 before recovering to around $0.8, failing to fully restore the peg. Resolv Labs said it temporarily paused protocol operations to contain the damage and is investigating the vulnerability that enabled issuance of unbacked USR. The exploit also appears to have triggered heavy sell pressure, with the attacker reportedly dumping USR on DeFi venues such as KyberSwap and Velora and converting proceeds into major crypto assets. The news spilled over to ecosystem tokens: Resolv’s governance/value-capture token RESOLV fell about 6% to ~$0.054. Traders should weigh immediate depeg/liquidation risk and the longer-term impact on confidence in fully on-chain, collateral-backed stablecoin designs.

AI regulation is back in focus as reporting highlights a push for tighter, narrower rules while business momentum grows. OpenAI plans to double its workforce, signaling an aggressive expansion in the tech sector and likely raising costs and competitive intensity. At the same time, political pressure is shaping the regulatory direction. The article references calls for Donald Trump to support narrow AI regulation amid backlash from parts of the political base. This combination—AI regulation uncertainty plus rapid scaling by major labs—can affect market sentiment across the broader tech ecosystem. For traders, the key point is that AI regulation headlines can move risk appetite quickly. If policy guidance becomes clearer, it can improve confidence in AI-adjacent equities and infrastructure spending narratives. If the debate turns contentious or enforcement signals harden, traders may rotate out of high-growth bets and into safer positioning. While the article does not provide crypto-specific fundamentals, AI regulation can still matter indirectly through liquidity flows to tech-linked themes and overall market risk conditions. In the short term, headline-driven volatility is the main risk. Over the long term, sustained workforce expansion like OpenAI’s could reinforce structural demand for compute and data, supporting tech valuations if regulatory outcomes remain predictable. AI regulation remains the central variable to watch: it can influence sentiment, funding expectations, and the timing of capital deployment across AI infrastructure and platforms.

IMX Technical Analysis (22 Mar 2026) highlights a short-to-medium term uptrend in IMX/USDT, with the pair trading around $0.1844 (+~11% over the period shown). The article says IMX is maintaining a bullish HH/HL (higher highs/higher lows) structure as long as price holds above the key swing low at $0.1677. Bullish trigger: a daily close above $0.1715 would confirm a new higher high and set up a move toward $0.1981 (major BOS level). If $0.1981 breaks, the next upside continuation target cited is $0.2409. MACD histogram remains supportive, while RSI is near neutral (around 51), suggesting momentum is present but not overheated. Resistance and risk: Supertrend is flagged bearish near the $0.20 resistance area, raising the probability of a pullback or a double-top style rejection. The downside “CHoCH” risk increases if IMX closes below $0.1677, which could trigger a bearish BOS and a quick retrace toward $0.1589 and $0.1496. A further bearish extension target mentioned is $0.0798, but this requires weekly confirmation (lower-low behavior). Catalyst context: the piece links strength to Robinhood spot listing news (19 Mar 2026) and notes positive divergence versus BTC. Traders are advised to monitor multi-timeframe (1D/3D/1W) levels and use $0.1677 for long invalidation. Overall, this IMX Technical Analysis frames the structure as bullish while emphasizing tight risk control around $0.1677.

South Korea’s tax agency is considering using private custodians to manage seized crypto holdings following a “mnemonic leak” incident. The move targets tighter operational control and security over seized crypto, amid concerns that leaked recovery information could increase the risk of unauthorized access or mishandling. For traders, this is primarily a custody and legal-process development rather than a new token or protocol launch. Still, the handling of seized crypto can affect market perception if investors expect eventual liquidation, changes to custody timelines, or stricter enforcement. In the short term, any chatter around “seized crypto” transfers or custody arrangements may add volatility to risk sentiment. Over the long term, improved custody governance could reduce security risk in enforcement actions, potentially stabilising expectations around how seized crypto is managed and when it might reach the market.

AR Technical Analysis for Mar 22 places AR near $1.69, inside a tight $1.63–$1.76 range while the broader trend remains down. Momentum is mixed: RSI is in neutral (about 42.85), while MACD shows a positive histogram, yet price stays below EMA20 (~$1.76) and Supertrend remains bearish. Traders are told to focus on the $1.6467–$1.76 pivot zone. A bullish path requires a volume-backed break above EMA20 ($1.76) and resistance ($1.7417), with RSI moving above 50 and MACD histogram expanding. Targets discussed are $2.07 (Supertrend resistance), then $2.5405, and a higher level at $3.1895 (weekly). A bearish path activates if AR breaks below $1.6467 on stronger volume, then tests $1.4908. Confirmation would include RSI dropping toward oversold (<30) and MACD histogram turning negative, with sustained closes below EMA20. Downside targets include $1.4908 first, and a major lower support near $0.7420. Risk management is emphasized: wait for 4H/1D closes and use breakout/retest entries rather than rushing. BTC is a key driver: BTC near $69,475 (down ~1.8%) can steer AR direction, with BTC support around $68,500 and resistance near $71,000. This AR Technical Analysis frames the setup as a decision point where either breakout can trigger the next leg.

China’s central bank will keep liquidity abundant. Pan Gongsheng, Governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), said at the China Development Forum 2026 annual meeting that China will continue implementing a moderately loose monetary policy. To support liquidity, the PBOC plans to use multiple policy tools, including the reserve requirement ratio (RRR), policy interest rates, and open market operations (OMO). The message points to a continued focus on maintaining liquidity stability rather than tightening financial conditions. For crypto traders, this liquidity stance can be a mild tailwind for risk assets if it supports broader market funding conditions, but the announcement offers no direct crypto policy or specific quantitative targets.

Onchain Lens data says the Resolve attacker used 200k USDC to mint 80M USR. The funds were then swapped into wstUSR, and subsequently converted into USDC and USDT. After these conversions, the Resolve attacker has reportedly deployed $17.24M (USDC/USDT) to buy 9,111 ETH, with additional ETH purchases possible. The pattern suggests the attacker is actively liquidating or repositioning value across stablecoins and ETH rather than pausing after the mint. For traders, this ties directly to potential near-term sell-pressure and volatility risk in ETH, driven by continued attacker rebalancing. Monitor on-chain flows for further USDC/USDT inflows to ETH DEX/CEX venues, as well as any changes in USR/wstUSR inventory that could foreshadow more trading activity.

Bitcoin hash rate drops 10% to about 904.53 EH/s after a sharp daily fall (-10.24%) and an ~8% weekly decline from near 1 ZH/s peaks. Network difficulty eased to ~133.79T, and block times stretched to around 10 minutes 40 seconds, suggesting reduced hashing power. Price, however, stayed relatively stable near $70,650. The divergence points to miner de-risking or partial shutdowns rather than aggressive sell-side distribution. Exchange-related sell pressure also appears limited: daily miner inflows rose to roughly 450 BTC (+0.8%). Miner balances declined gradually from ~1.85M BTC to ~1.78M BTC, consistent with slower selling while stronger miners hold. Bitcoin hash rate drops again highlight ongoing tactical capacity cycling. While short-term hash rate volatility and falling 7-day/14-day averages signal tighter margins, longer-term trends (100-day/200-day) remain upward, implying network expansion is not yet broken. The main risk for traders is timing: if profitability keeps compressing, delayed reserve selling could surface later and increase volatility. Key takeaway for traders: monitor BTC spot reaction versus hash-rate volatility and difficulty adjustments. A continued low-volatility reset could be a stabilization phase; a renewed margin squeeze could shift the market back toward bearish pressure.