Latest Crypto News | Bitcoin, Ethereum and Altcoin Updates

Iran has rejected any extension of the US-Iran ceasefire. The US says Mojtaba Khamenei is the main obstacle to an agreement. In prediction markets tracking an “Iran ceasefire extension” scenario, the odds of a ceasefire by April 30 have fallen to 14.5% (down from 32% the prior day). Traders appear skeptical that diplomacy will produce results within the next nine days. The largest move occurred as a brief spike to 32% earlier in the evening, which then fully reversed. A separate contract reflects the probability of an Iranian regime fall. While the April 30 window remains low at 0.8%, the June 30 market has risen to 8.5% (from 6%). Market pricing suggests investors are shifting from a short-term to a longer-term timeline for instability. Liquidity is moderate: the ceasefire market shows about $68,607 in USDC volume over the past day, while around $4,074 in USDC is enough to move the ceasefire odds by 5 percentage points. For regime-fall contracts, $23,169 would be required to move odds by 5 points, implying more capital is needed. If traders buy “YES” at 15¢, the contract payout would be $1 if a ceasefire is announced by April 30 (about a 6.7x return), but the US assessment pointing to Khamenei reduces confidence that an “Iran ceasefire extension” will happen quickly. Watch for CENTCOM statements or any leadership/rhetoric changes around Mojtaba Khamenei, which could reprice markets rapidly.

Coinbase’s Independent Advisory Board says quantum computing isn’t a threat today, but a future, sufficiently powerful quantum computer could break the cryptography that secures crypto wallets and proof-of-stake consensus. The board urges teams to start post‑quantum security upgrades now, even if timelines point to at least a decade. Key focus for crypto traders: proof-of-stake chains may carry extra exposure because validator signature schemes could fail. Coinbase specifically cites Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL), noting Solana’s newer signature approach can support token migration to quantum‑resistant addresses, while Ethereum has a near‑term roadmap to upgrade signatures. Coinbase also highlights wallet-level risk: if quantum-vulnerable keys are exposed and users don’t upgrade, access could be revoked and funds may be permanently lost. In contrast, Coinbase points to “more quantum-ready” networks. Algorand is described as having completed its first quantum‑resistant transaction on mainnet, though block proposal and committee voting still have potential attack considerations. For Aptos (APT), Coinbase says authentication keys can be updated to post‑quantum public keys via a signed transaction, without forcing asset migration. Bottom line: the quantum computing risk is currently low, but the market may eventually price in the operational complexity and migration plans for ETH and SOL as post‑quantum cryptography rollouts progress.

New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase Financial Markets and Gemini, alleging they ran prediction markets without the New York State Gaming Commission’s required licences. The state says both firms offered event-based “contracts” tied to sports and elections without the proper registration, and it disputes the product eligibility for users aged 18–21, despite New York setting 21 as the minimum age for mobile sports betting. The AG is seeking fines, restitution, and recovery of profits it deems illegal. Coinbase is challenging the case in federal court, arguing removal under federal-question/federal-officer statutes and claiming “complete preemption” via broader federal oversight (including the CFTC’s stance on event-based trading products). Reporting also indicates New York is seeking at least $2.2 billion from Coinbase and $1.2 billion from Gemini. For traders, the key risk is regulatory uncertainty around prediction markets and their on-ramps. In the short term, this could pressure sentiment and volumes for event-based derivatives. Longer term, outcomes may hinge on whether federal authority (CFTC) prevails over state gambling rules.

Tron founder Justin Sun has filed a lawsuit in a California federal court against World Liberty Financial over alleged WLFI token freeze and blocked governance participation. Sun claims WLFI contracts now include blacklist-like controls that can “freeze, restrict, and effectively confiscate” investor tokens, stripping his voting rights and threatening to permanently destroy holdings via “burn.” The dispute centers on a WLFI governance proposal involving 62.2B+ WLFI tokens. Sun argues the vote structure shifts from indefinite lockups to fixed vesting terms while leaving non-accepting holders effectively locked, and conditions governance access on future terms—so he says it is not “true governance.” Sun says he tried direct resolution first and stresses the lawsuit is separate from his support for US President Donald Trump and his crypto agenda, targeting specific individuals at the World Liberty team. World Liberty has denied the blacklist claims on X and said it will “see you in court.” For WLFI traders, the key risk is governance-token accessibility and any potential token burn outcome, which could pressure sentiment, liquidity expectations, and short-term positioning.

Tron founder Justin Sun has filed a lawsuit targeting World Liberty Financial (WLFI) over alleged control and governance rights for the WLFI token. Sun, described as one of the largest outside investors in WLFI, says the dispute concerns who has authority over WLFI token rights. The case escalates a high-profile conflict tied to U.S. President Donald Trump’s network, focusing on WLFI token governance rather than product or technical performance. For traders, the immediate implication is headline-driven volatility risk: legal proceedings can increase uncertainty around WLFI token access, voting power, or future distribution. In the short term, watch for reactions in WLFI price action and liquidity as market participants price in potential court outcomes. In the long term, the direction of rulings could determine governance control and investor confidence for WLFI, influencing how traders position around regulatory/legal tail risks. Overall, the development adds legal risk premium to WLFI while not directly changing blockchain fundamentals.

Three separate cases have been filed in the New Zealand High Court in Auckland against bet365, Super Group and Skycity over offshore online gambling offered to New Zealand residents. The New Zealand High Court action is being pursued as a coordinated group claim, though it is not yet formally consolidated for joint case management. Skycity’s case is positioned as a class action covering player losses from February 2020 to February 2026. It names Skycity Entertainment Group, Skycity Auckland Holdings Limited and Malta-based Silvereye Entertainment Limited (a Gaming Innovation Group subsidiary operating under a Malta Gaming Authority licence). Skycity denies liability. An interim suppression order has been granted for the plaintiffs. The bet365 proceedings name Hillside (Gaming) ENC, Hillside (Sports) and CEO Denise Coates personally. bet365 has formally objected to New Zealand court jurisdiction. The Super Group proceedings name CEO Neal Menashe personally and multiple corporate entities, including those connected to the Betway and Spin brands and Kiwi’s Treasure casino marketed to New Zealand players. The legal push follows New Zealand regulatory changes, including June 2025 Racing Industry Act 2020 amendments that make it illegal for offshore operators (except TAB NZ) to accept racing/sports bets from NZ residents. From May 1, an Online Casino Gambling Bill is expected to extend prohibitions to online casino advertising and introduce a licensing framework for up to 15 operators, with a December 1 market-exit deadline for unlicensed providers. All three firms have signalled interest in applying for NZ licences, but they now face potential restitution liabilities while seeking regulated market access. The Skycity claim is also described as aligned with a prior EU Court of Justice approach affecting how Malta-licensed operators may face player restitution claims in prohibited markets.

MicroStrategy’s treasury firm, Strategy, says its Bitcoin holdings are back in profit after overtaking BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and completing a new purchase. Key figures: Strategy now holds 815,061 BTC after buying 34,164 BTC for about $2.54B on April 20. Its full-reserve average acquisition cost is about $75,527 per Bitcoin. Bitcoin has recently moved back above that level, pushing Strategy back above breakeven after a loss period that started in early February. Performance metrics: Strategy reported a 6.2% Bitcoin yield for the first three weeks of April 2026, which it equated to 47,079 BTC (about $3.6B at the cited market values). It also posted a 9.5% year-to-date Bitcoin yield for 2026. Relative to BlackRock: Strategy’s 815,061 BTC versus BlackRock’s IBIT at 806,178 BTC puts Strategy ahead on total BTC held. The article notes Strategy’s share of total Bitcoin supply has surpassed 4%. Implication for traders: the buffer between Strategy’s realized cost basis and the current Bitcoin price is described as narrow. CryptoQuant estimates Strategy’s unrealized profit at roughly $242M, meaning modest price moves could quickly swing sentiment again if Bitcoin falls back below its average cost basis. Bottom line: Strategy’s Bitcoin profit headline is currently bullish for Treasury-led narratives, but the margin of safety remains tight—so traders may watch Bitcoin closely for confirmation or a quick reversal.

Harvard reportedly cut about $85M from its Bitcoin holdings and added a new $87M position in Ethereum (ETH), according to coverage cited in the article. The ETH allocation was reportedly routed via BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust, highlighting a preference for regulated investment vehicles. Separately, Charles Schwab has begun direct trading of Bitcoin and Ethereum through its Schwab Crypto service. For now, the platform limits offerings to BTC and ETH, reinforcing the idea that Ethereum is gaining “institutional spotlight” alongside Bitcoin. Vivek Raman, CEO of Etherealize, frames the trend as an “opening for ETH to be money.” He argues that regulatory momentum and new policy initiatives (mentioned as GENIUS and CLARITY) are reducing friction for traditional finance firms, making it easier to allocate to ETH at scale without handling tokens directly. The core takeaway for traders: ETH adoption is increasingly flowing through brokerages and ETF-like structures, which can broaden demand and improve liquidity, while also encouraging a BTC/ETH allocation narrative rather than BTC-only positioning.

US law firm Sullivan & Cromwell has apologized to a federal judge after AI hallucinations caused a court filing to include around 40 incorrect citations and other errors. Andrew Dietderich, co-head of the firm’s global restructuring team, wrote to Chief Judge Martin Glenn of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, saying the firm had policies intended to prevent incorrect citations but that the review steps were not followed. A legal-technology database managed by Damien Charlotin has logged 1,334 AI hallucination incidents in court filings worldwide, including more than 900 in the US, mostly involving fabricated citations. Dietderich said the firm is conducting an internal investigation and has taken “immediate remedial measures,” including a full review of how the errors occurred, and is evaluating enhancements to its training and review process. He also noted that the errors were flagged by a rival law firm, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, which he called to apologize. The episode underscores the operational and compliance risks of AI in high-stakes legal work, especially when oversight processes fail.

Bitcoin price prediction points to rising volatility risk after whale buy walls appear to weaken. The article says BTC has been trading in a tight range around ~$75,300–$75,759, while a liquidity heatmap shows support near the mid-$73,000 area has become less reliable. At the same time, liquidity clusters above are stacked around ~$76,000–$78,000, suggesting price may move toward these pockets once selling pressure builds. A separate chart-based setup (Crypto Patel) highlights a repeated bearish pattern: BTC has previously formed rising channels after sharp selloffs, then broke down and dropped roughly 30%–31% when key support failed. If the current rising channel breaks to the downside, the Bitcoin price prediction scenario targets about $47,400. Traders are advised to watch the lower trendline/channel boundary as the key level. A confirmed breakdown with strong sell volume would raise odds of a deeper correction toward $47,400. If BTC holds the channel and reclaims momentum, the bearish thesis weakens. Overall, direction is not confirmed yet, but the setup implies a bigger move could be approaching—making $47,400 a key downside reference for risk management.

DoorDash (NASDAQ: DASH) plans to enable stablecoin payments across its global marketplace via a partnership with blockchain infrastructure firm Tempo. The setup would let users, merchants, and delivery drivers settle orders with stablecoins in more than 40 countries, targeting faster payouts, lower cross-border transfer costs, and greater payment flexibility. The announcement comes amid volatile DASH trading. Shares closed at $182.45 (down 3.87%) after trading near $192.50 earlier, then edged up to $183.91 in after-hours—suggesting traders are beginning to price in the longer-term impact of stablecoin payments, not just day-to-day noise. DoorDash already operates at scale, reporting 903 million orders in Q4 2025 and $29.7B gross order value. If stablecoin payments reduce settlement friction and fees in international flows, the market could view it as supportive of margin improvement and stronger overseas expansion. However, the near-term move appears sentiment-driven rather than linked to direct on-chain token flows. Broader context: the deal fits a wider payments trend, with major players pushing stablecoin rails to reduce costs and speed settlement.

Ethereum (ETH) is showing bullish technical signals as traders watch two chart setups. One points to renewed weekly accumulation: ETH is near $2,330 on the weekly timeframe, while RSI is rebounding from lower levels. The analysis also highlights the 200-week simple moving average as prior long-term support. If ETH holds the accumulation zone and strengthens above the recent range, momentum could turn more constructive over the coming months. The second setup focuses on a long-term wedge (compression) pattern. The wedge remains active, with repeated higher lows beneath resistance and a prior “fakeout” above the upper boundary, suggesting rallies have been rejected before. A key resistance area is flagged around 3,242.87. If ETH breaks above and holds it, the chart-based outlook projects higher targets, including 7,409.85. Additional (non-guaranteed) Fibonacci projection levels for the larger move are cited near $5,172, $8,429, and $15,688. Overall, this is pattern-based and needs follow-through. Traders should monitor support holding (weekly accumulation zone) and confirmation from a sustained move above the wedge resistance for improved breakout odds.

Trump extended the US-Iran ceasefire indefinitely just before it expired, but the US naval blockade remains in place. In the April 30 US-Iran ceasefire prediction market, the YES probability is 15%, down from 32% a day earlier, and it has not rebounded after the extension. Traders appear cautious about the “dual approach” (ceasefire plus blockade). Iran’s refusal to engage and continued military threats have kept risk sentiment weak, and the move has not provided enough clarity with nine days left. Market structure suggests limited near-term certainty but meaningful re-pricing risk: daily volume is about $68,607 in USDC, and roughly $4,074 is needed to shift odds by 5 percentage points. At 15¢, a YES share would pay $1 if hostilities end by April 30 (about ~6.67x), but only a tangible diplomatic breakthrough is likely to unlock that outcome. Watch for new signals from regional intermediaries such as Oman or Qatar, and any changes in CENTCOM’s posture.

BlackRock bought $900 million in Bitcoin via its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) ETF, strengthening bullish sentiment in crypto prediction markets. On Polymarket, the contract targeting Bitcoin at $80,000 in April 2026 saw YES odds jump to 71.5% from 44% within 24 hours. The $80,000 market moved sharply after the buy, climbing from the mid-40% range to above 70%. Liquidity signals supported the move. Daily USDC volume on the $80,000 contract reached about $105,235. The article notes that it takes roughly $25K to shift the market by 5 points, and a sentiment swing from 46% to 50% occurred quickly (around 8:48 AM). By contrast, the $150,000 target was far less active, with only about $328 in actual USDC traded, indicating thinner speculative positioning for more extreme outcomes. The news frames BlackRock’s purchase as part of a broader pattern of institutional Bitcoin accumulation during geopolitical stress, referencing current Middle East tensions. Traders also appear to be factoring both institutional demand and geopolitical risk into the odds. Key variables to watch include: further IBIT purchases by BlackRock, any escalation or de-escalation in Middle East tensions, and upcoming Fed commentary, which could reinforce or reverse the current pricing.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) are urging vigilance and calling the situation a “silent battlefield,” casting doubt on a US-Iran ceasefire expected to be decided by April 30. The US-Iran ceasefire odds fell to about 15%, down from 32% 24 hours earlier, as traders priced in a higher risk of escalation and a potential “finger on the trigger” posture. In prediction-market terms, the ceasefire market dropped 17 points in one day. The contract tied to April 30 shows roughly 15% implied probability, while the June 30 “Will the Iranian Regime Fall” contract climbed to about 8.5% from 1% (prompting hedging for longer-term regime instability). The June 30 rise is read as concern over possible internal IRGC fractures. Liquidity exists but is not deep: the ceasefire market is quoted around $68,607 USDC per day, with about $4,074 needed to move price by 5 points, making the market sensitive to incremental headlines and less able to absorb large directional bets without slippage. The largest single move was a ~5-point spike late in the session. Key catalysts to watch include any statements from CENTCOM or the Pentagon, plus intermediary activity via Oman or Qatar—any shift could rapidly reprice US-Iran ceasefire odds for both the April 30 deadline and later horizons. Keyword focus: US-Iran ceasefire odds are compressing fast on IRGC rhetoric; traders will likely keep re-hedging until clarity emerges.

Arbitrum moved quickly after the Kelp bridge exploit, freezing 30,766 ETH (about $71.2M). The funds were transferred from a wallet tied to the KelpDAO attack into an “intermediary frozen wallet,” meaning the original address can’t move the ETH. The next step requires Arbitrum governance, not the Security Council. Arbitrum’s Security Council said it debated for hours and coordinated with law enforcement on the attacker’s identity before executing the freeze. Some users criticized the move, arguing that council-level freezing undermines decentralization. The incident started Saturday when Kelp, a liquid restaking protocol, was attacked via its LayerZero-powered bridge. Loss estimates reached at least $293M. The attacker then used stolen Kelp tokens to borrow assets on Aave, creating “bad debt” risk that could spill into broader DeFi lending exposure. Traders watching ARB may focus on whether the ETH freeze leads to recovery, victim distribution, or prolonged governance disputes. ARB sentiment and Arbitrum governance timelines could act as the next market catalyst. Watch how Arbitrum governance handles this ETH freeze and whether broader DeFi risk spreads.

An opinion piece argues an XRP price prediction (fall below $1 within five years) is wrong and easy to debunk. It cites three points. First, the article claims XRP is down over 60% from its July high, but similar drawdowns have happened before—especially after strong pumps tied to the prior Bitcoin cycle. It notes broader “tech-style” overheat-to-correction patterns, comparing it to past Nasdaq crashes and suggesting XRP could still benefit from the next macro rally. Second, it disputes the claim that bank demand for XRP cross-border payments “never materialized.” The author points to XRP Ledger (XRPL) records: rising network activity by December, and the highest number of wallets ever by mid-March. The argument is that XRP demand is still driven by usage of the network. Third, it references acceptance signals for XRP, including Goldman Sachs holding $153M in XRP at the time of disclosure, plus the U.S. digital asset stockpile policy signed under President Donald Trump that includes XRP. The piece stresses this may not guarantee price support, but it is framed as a political and institutional recognition factor. For traders, this XRP price prediction debate is unlikely to be a direct catalyst, but it can influence sentiment around “$1” narratives and support renewed dip-buying if market conditions align with the next risk-on cycle. Overall, the takeaway: the bearish thesis is challenged by historical drawdowns, XRPL activity, and institutional/institutional-adjacent exposure.

Blockchain.com has launched self-custody perpetual futures inside its non-custodial DeFi wallet, routed through Hyperliquid. The product lets traders open and manage leveraged positions without moving funds to a centralized exchange—keeping private keys under user control while executing trades from the wallet. For traders, the key points are: self-custody perpetual futures support BTC as collateral, can be funded in a single transaction with BTC, and aim to cover 190+ crypto markets with leverage up to 40x. Perpetual futures trade the underlying price with no expiration, making them a direct tool for ongoing long/short exposure. The move also fits a broader trend toward non-crypto and tokenized perpetuals. The article notes CFTC chair Michael Selig signaled a potentially more permissive path for such derivatives in the US, but the current offering is still limited to non-US investors. Bottom line for trading: self-custody perpetual futures may improve access to leveraged BTC exposure and could lift order flow toward perpetual markets, though US participation remains constrained for now.

Gold price rose about 1.8% to around $2,485/oz in London trading after the US-Iran agreed to extend their ceasefire by 90 days. The immediate driver was a US dollar retreat: the DXY fell ~0.6%, easing demand for the greenback as a safe haven. Spot gold traded roughly between $2,460 and $2,492, while volume was ~15% below the 30-day average. Despite the gold price breakout attempt, analysts flagged “lack of bullish conviction.” COMEX gold open interest rose only ~2.1% and major gold ETFs saw minimal movement (GLD inflows about 0.8 tonnes). Price action also failed to clear the key $2,500 resistance area. Geopolitical context remains temporary. The extension keeps nuclear monitoring in place and maintains existing sanctions frameworks. Markets showed cautious relief: Brent crude fell ~2.1% to ~$78.30/bbl and Treasury yields edged lower, while institutional commentary said structural tensions are unresolved. Policy and positioning remain central. The Fed rate is 4.25%–4.50% and real rates are still positive (~1.2%), which typically weighs on non-yielding assets like gold. Physical demand signals were softer (India imports down YoY; China weekly demand slightly below 2024). For traders, the gold price move looks more like dollar-driven reaction/short covering than a sustained trend.

Bitcoin price climbed back above $77,000, reaching about $77,518, after the US extended the Iran ceasefire deadline. The move calmed immediate geopolitical fears and supported a mild crypto recovery. BTC rose roughly 2.45% over 24 hours, while Ethereum edged up to around $2,361 (+2.28%). Oil also reacted: Brent and WTI both fell more than 2% as concerns about near-term supply disruptions eased (Brent near $93.45; WTI near $91.75). The macro signal matters because crypto, including Bitcoin, often trades as a risk-sensitive asset during geopolitical stress. Institutional demand remains a key structural driver. US spot Bitcoin ETFs hold $102.91B in assets under management (as of Apr 22, 2026). After a period of outflows, March saw net inflows of about $1.32B. ETF inflows typically require spot Bitcoin purchases, tightening exchange-available supply and adding upward pressure over time. Traders are watching levels: Bitcoin faces resistance near the recent swing high at $78,320. A confirmed break could open upside toward the 127.2% Fibonacci extension around $81,951. Support sits near the 23.6% retracement level at $75,170.

The US has halted dollar shipments to Iraq’s Central Bank, freezing Federal Reserve Bank of New York bulk cash deliveries. The US says these US dollar shipments to Iraq have supported Iran-backed militias through Iraq’s financial system, enabling weapons purchases and fighter payments. This is part of a wider “financial statecraft” effort that targets the host nation’s access to the global dollar network rather than using military force. Iraq relies heavily on dollars for trade settlement, especially food and medicine, and the dinar is pegged via a US Treasury-managed account. As access narrows, the parallel-market dinar rate is reported to fall, raising the cost and availability of imported staples. Reported near-term pressure includes: higher food prices and potential shortages (wheat/rice/cooking oil), delays for pharmaceutical imports, and inflation-related erosion of purchasing power. Key context: the move follows years of US sanctions and prior designations of Iraq-based militia leaders, which analysts say were insufficient to stop dollar flows through formal and informal channels. The US Treasury says exemptions may exist for legitimate food and medicine, but banks face “de-risking” and secondary-sanctions fears, complicating humanitarian trade. Regional reaction is mixed: Iran calls it “economic terrorism” and threatens alternative ties with Iraq, while Gulf states are largely silent. Meanwhile, regional trade partners and the Kurdish Regional Government face additional disruption. For traders, the headline is a FX/geopolitical risk event: continued US dollar shipments restrictions to Iraq can boost USD demand, raise regional risk premia, and increase volatility across risk assets—including crypto—especially if humanitarian channels fail or economic instability escalates.

XRP is nearing a bullish shift after reclaiming its $1.41 realized price, a level that marks the average cost basis of holders. Analyst VinCoop says reclaiming realized price often separates “loss-sell” pressure from “in-profit” behavior, supporting order book stability and improving sentiment. Technically, XRP is compressing inside a symmetrical triangle. A measured-move target points to about a 55% upside, with an initial goal near $2.24. Traders watching momentum also note a possible extension toward the $2.40 area if the breakout gains traction. Key levels to manage risk: a daily close above $1.46 to keep short-term momentum intact. The $1.57–$1.60 zone is the next major resistance that should flip to support. On the downside, $1.35–$1.40 is described as the critical trend line aligned with major moving averages. Broader context remains mixed: Bitcoin’s volatility is macro-driven, but XRP is showing more independent relative strength. CoinCodex data cited in the article puts XRP around $1.44, up roughly 7.38% over the past week, suggesting accumulation rather than short-term speculation. With volatility at yearly lows and price tightening toward a potential directional move, XRP’s narrative may shift from range trading to sustained upside if bulls force a breakout above the triangle’s upper boundary.

Bitfire, a Hong Kong-listed wealth manager, will acquire the trading system and investment team from Avenir Group, the private investment arm of Chinese crypto billionaire Li Lin, for $1.6 million. The deal effectively moves part of Li’s in-house crypto trading into a public company where he is the largest shareholder. Bitfire says it plans to launch a bitcoin-focused strategy, “Alpha BTC,” targeting more than 10,000 bitcoins (about $760 million) within one year. The approach relies on derivatives trading, including options tied to bitcoin and products such as BlackRock’s IBIT. Avenir already holds a large IBIT position: 18.3 million shares valued at roughly $908 million at end-2025. The broader context is Hong Kong’s push to become a regulated digital-asset hub after China banned crypto trading in 2021. Bitfire’s move also aligns with Hong Kong’s growing institutional framework, including recent stablecoin licensing for HSBC and Standard Chartered. For traders, the key takeaway is that Bitfire’s plan links a listed vehicle to bitcoin derivatives tied to an ETF wrapper (IBIT), which may increase institutional-style risk exposure to BTC even without immediate spot-coin inflows.

Bitcoin rose to about $77,500, up 2.2% in 24 hours, after President Trump said he would extend the Iran ceasefire indefinitely. Traders also reacted to Strategy’s disclosed purchase of 34,164 BTC for $2.54 billion, its largest buy since 2024. The acquisition lifts Strategy’s total holdings to 815,061 BTC and moves its position modestly into profit after months of losses, with an average cost basis cited near $75,527. Crypto flows improved: CoinShares reported $1.4 billion of inflows to global crypto funds last week, led by Bitcoin with $1.12 billion. Ethereum added $328 million. Market structure also looks supportive. Analysts say Bitcoin is holding above short-term holders’ realized price (around $69,400), which can lower near-term liquidation cascade risk if sentiment turns. A Nomura survey found 65% of Japanese institutional investors now hold Bitcoin for diversification. Near-term levels to watch: a sustained break above $80,000 would suggest bearish funding is flipping into a squeeze, while a drop below $75,000 would imply the ceasefire extension may already be priced in. Geopolitics around the Strait of Hormuz remains a key variable for Bitcoin volatility.

A survey by Epoch AI says AI adoption is becoming mainstream in the US workplace. Epoch AI polled 2,021 Americans in early April (via Ipsos KnowledgePanel). Key findings on AI adoption and productivity: - Half of employed Americans use AI tools for work and personal tasks. - 21% say AI created new tasks for them, while 27% say it replaced existing tasks (mainly via automation). - AI work-use is higher among users who pay for tools. - Among employed AI users, 38% rely on free AI tools for work and personal tasks. - Paid-tier usage is much higher: 58% among self-paying subscribers, and 76% among employer-provided subscriptions. - Use is also higher among users with paid access to tools such as Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini. Epoch AI frames the results as an early signal of broader workforce impact: most people still use AI mainly for personal tasks, but about half use it at least as much for work—and this share rises further with paid, especially employer-provided, access. Broader context mentioned in the article: - Singapore plans to train 100,000 workers to become “AI bilingual,” targeting AI-exposed sectors like legal, accountancy, and HR. - Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek said in March that firms integrating enterprise-wide AI will be necessary. Overall, the report is about AI adoption changing job workflows—not direct crypto regulation or protocol changes.

Kalshi reportedly plans to launch crypto perpetual futures (“crypto perps”), moving beyond prediction markets into onshore derivatives competition. The reported rollout could start as early as April 27 and would place Kalshi in direct competition with major venues such as Binance, Hyperliquid, Coinbase, and Kraken. Crypto perpetual futures let traders take leveraged price exposure without a fixed expiry date. The report suggests early products may include BTC and other large crypto assets. Kalshi has not publicly confirmed the launch and declined to comment. Regulation appears to be a key catalyst. Kalshi operates under U.S. CFTC oversight and recently obtained a license that enables margin trading. CFTC Chair Michael Selig has signaled the agency is open to allowing these offerings in the U.S., which could pull more trading activity onto regulated rails. Competition is also coming from prediction-market firms and adjacent products. Polymarket has stated “perps are coming,” while Coinbase and Kraken have launched perpetual-style or tokenized-stock perpetual products for users outside the U.S. For traders, the main shift is potential liquidity migration and tighter competition in leverage venues. If crypto perpetual futures gain traction onshore, it may increase activity around BTC/ETH, but also heighten sensitivity to volatility due to rising derivatives positioning. (Trader note: focus on funding rates, open interest, and basis as new crypto perpetual futures liquidity emerges.)

Bank of Korea governor Shin Hyun-song says the central bank will accelerate CBDC and commercial-bank deposit tokens as the “future of money.” In his inaugural policy speech, he pointed to Project Hangang’s second phase to expand retail CBDC use and deposit-token pilots. The governor framed deposit tokens as a stablecoin-like mechanism, but issued by regulated commercial banks and aimed mainly at institutional transfers. The article also notes critics’ concerns about tighter state oversight, including the risk of restrictive controls over funds. Notably, Shin’s remarks focused on CBDC and deposit tokens, while the speech did not highlight won-stablecoins that fintechs use to compete with USDT/USDC. The coverage cites his prior cautious stance from the BIS context on risks to financial-market stability. For traders, the immediate watchpoint is liquidity and cross-border rails tied to CBDC-linked products. Even so, won-stablecoin supply is tiny (about $1.3M, led by KWRQ) versus the global stablecoin market (~$320B+), despite South Korea’s large role in stablecoin payments (around 60% of global flows). (Informational only; not investment advice.)

Bitcoin spot ETF net inflows reached $11.84M on April 21, marking six straight days of buying. On Polymarket, the Bitcoin contract for April $80,000 moved to 60.5% YES (from 44% the prior day), after geopolitical de-escalation linked to Iran’s ceasefire/Strait of Hormuz announcement and continued buying tied to BlackRock’s IBIT ETF. The odds jump suggests the rally above $78,000 is being driven more by risk relief than by broad macro. Liquidity looks solid: the $80,000 sub-market shows about $105,235/day in actual USDC volume, and it takes ~$24,792 to move odds by 5 points. By contrast, the $150,000 contract remains thin at ~0.1% YES, with only ~$328/day in actual USDC trading. The largest move in the last 24 hours was a 5-point spike around 8:48 AM (46% to 50% YES). With Bitcoin spot ETF inflows and market odds rising together, traders may watch for follow-through in ETF demand and any renewed US-Iran headlines that could pull risk sentiment back. For many, the near-term focus is whether price can hold around the path toward the $80,000 level before April ends.

Iraq’s military? No. Iran refuses further US talks, saying it faces pressure and coercion. Reuters reports this rejection makes a formal April 30 ceasefire unlikely. In crypto prediction markets, the “April 30 ceasefire” contract collapsed: the YES price fell to around $0.15, implying April 30 ceasefire odds of about 14.5% versus 32% the day before. With roughly nine days left, traders are pricing a higher risk of renewed military action. The repricing was fast and sharp. The April 30 contract saw a prior one-day spike of about 5 points, but the rejection news erased those gains. Trading is not extremely thin: daily face-value volume is about $213,788, while actual USDC traded is about $68,607. Moving the market by ~5 points is estimated to cost ~$4,074, suggesting liquidity is moderate. What to watch next for April 30 ceasefire odds: new statements from Donald Trump and CENTCOM, and any mediation signals from Oman or Qatar. Any diplomatic or rhetoric shift will be needed quickly to reverse the current risk pricing.